高级检索

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

酸性稻田全程氨氧化菌对氮肥施加的响应

付亚军,  高文龙,  陈淼

downloadPDF
文章导航 > 热带生物学报  > 2024 >  15(5): 509-519
付亚军, 高文龙, 陈淼. 酸性稻田全程氨氧化菌对氮肥施加的响应[J]. 热带生物学报, 2024, 15(5): 509-519. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.20230128
引用本文: 付亚军, 高文龙, 陈淼. 酸性稻田全程氨氧化菌对氮肥施加的响应[J]. 热带生物学报, 2024, 15(5): 509-519. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.20230128
shu
FU Yajun, GAO Wenlong, CHEN Miao. Response of comammox Nitrospira to nitrogen fertilization in acidic paddy soil[J]. Journal of Tropical Biology, 2024, 15(5): 509-519. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.20230128
Citation: FU Yajun, GAO Wenlong, CHEN Miao. Response of comammox Nitrospira to nitrogen fertilization in acidic paddy soil[J]. Journal of Tropical Biology, 2024, 15(5): 509-519. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.20230128
shu

酸性稻田全程氨氧化菌对氮肥施加的响应

doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.20230128

  • 1. 海南大学 生态与环境学院, 海口 570228;

  • 2. 中国热带农业科学院 环境与植物保护研究所, 海口 571101;

  • 3. 海南儋州热带农业生态系统国家野外科学观测研究站, 海南 儋州 571737

基金项目: 

广东省基础与应用基础研究基金项目(2022A1515010804)

中国热带农业科学院基本科研业务费专项(1630042022001)

海南省重点研发计划项目(ZDYF2021XDNY280)

详细信息
    第一作者:

    付亚军(1998-),男,海南大学生态与环境学院2021级硕士研究生。E-mail:f1056603026@163.com

    通信作者:

    陈淼(1985-),男,博士,副研究员。研究方向:农田土壤碳氮循环。E-mail:cataseppiael@163.com

  • 中图分类号: S511

Response of comammox Nitrospira to nitrogen fertilization in acidic paddy soil

  • 1. College of Ecology and Environment, Hainan University, Haikou, Hainan 570228;

  • 2. Environment and Plant Protection Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Haikou, Hainan 571101;

  • 3. Hainan Danzhou Tropical Agro-ecosystem National Observation and Research Station, Danzhou 571737, Hainan, China

  • 摘要: 为了揭示酸性稻田全程、半程氨氧化菌对增氮的响应与敏感性差异，通过盆栽实验，设置施加氮肥处理，测定分蘖期、抽穗期、成熟期全程及半程氨氧化菌的丰度，比较全程、半程氨氧化菌对施肥的响应敏感性。结果表明：未施肥与施肥情形下，分蘖期、抽穗期、成熟期土壤氨氧化菌的优势种群均为全程氨氧化菌(Clade A:3.24×108～7.24×108 copies·g-1,Clade B:2.14×108～1.48×109 copies·g-1)而非半程氨氧化菌(AOA:2.00×107～4.37×107 copies·g-1,AOB:1.35×107～3.31×107 copies·g-1)。施肥的主效应（Clade A:P=0.762,Clade B：氮素利用率=0.398）、生育期的主效应（Clade A:P=0.264,Clade B:P=0.237）、施肥与生育期的交互效应（Clade A:P=0.316,Clade B:P=0.294）均不显著，即全程氨氧化菌两大分支A和B季节变化并不显著，二者对尿素施加的响应并不敏感。未施氮肥与施加氮肥的情形下全程氨氧化菌丰度的环境调控因子可能有所不同。未施氮肥情形下，全程氨氧化菌的2个分支A（Clade A:R=-0.73,P=0.027）和B（Clade B:R=-0.75,P=0.019）的丰度均与土壤总氮含量呈负相关，预示着无外源性氮输入情形下，全程氨氧化菌的生长受土壤有机氮、氨化作用和游离氨负向调控。施加氮肥情形下，全程氨氧化菌尤其是分支A的丰度可能更多地受土壤p H、氧化还原电位（Eh）及NH4+-N含量的影响。氮肥的施加显著影响全程、半程氨氧化菌的群落共变性，致使Clade B丰度与AOA、AOB丰度的正向共变趋势消失。
    Abstract: In order to reveal the differences in response and sensitivity of comamox Nitrospira and incomplete nitrifiers to nitrogen addition in acidic rice fields, a pot experiment was conducted to investigate the impact of urea fertilization, in conjunction with growth stage, on complete nitrifiers, and to compare their responsiveness to nitrogen（N） fertilization with that of incomplete nitrifiers in acidic paddy soils. The research results revealed that irrespective of fertilization conditions, comammox Nitrospira(Clade A: 3.24×108-7.24×108 copies·g-1, Clade B: 2.14×108-1.48×109 copies · g-1) rather than ammonia-oxidizing archaea(AOA: 2.00×107-4.37×107 copies·g-1) and nitriteoxidizing bacteria(AOB: 1.35×107-3.31×107 copies·g-1), were the dominant ammonia oxidizers across tillering,heading, and maturity stages. Neither urea fertilization（Clade A: P = 0.762, Clade B: P = 0.398） nor growth stage（Clade A: P = 0.264, Clade B: P = 0.237）, nor their interaction（Clade A: P = 0.316, Clade B: P = 0.294）,significantly influenced comammox Nitrospira clades A and B, as their populations remained consistent across the fertilizer treatments and seasons. It is plausible that the environmental factors governing comammox bacterial abundance in urea-fertilized and unfertilized soils may vary. In the absence of urea, the abundance of comammox Nitrospira clades A（R =-0.73, P = 0.027） and B（R =-0.75, P = 0.019） exhibited a negative correlation with soil N, suggesting that increased ammonia, ammonification, and organic N may not be conducive to comammox bacterial growth and activity in unfertilized soils. Conversely, in the presence of urea, comammox bacteria,especially clade A, were notably influenced by soil pH and redox potential（Eh）. Notably, urea application had the potential to alter the interplay between complete and incomplete nitrifiers, as evidenced by the absence of a positive mode of population co-variation of clade B with AOA and AOB following urea application.
  • [1] LI Y, CHAPMAN S, NICOL G, et al. Nitrification and nitrifiers in acidic soils[J]. Soil Biology&Biochemistry,2018, 116:290-301.
    [2] DAIMS H, LEBEDEVA E V, PJEVAC P, et al. Complete nitrification by Nitrospira bacteria[J]. Nature, 2015, 528:504-509.
    [3] VAN KESSEL M A H J, SPETH D R, ALBERTSEN M, et al. Complete nitrification by a single microorganism[J].Nature, 2015, 528:555-559.
    [4] KITS K D, SEDLACEK C J, LEBEDEVA E V, et al.Kinetic analysis of a complete nitrifier reveals an oligotrophic lifestyle[J]. Nature, 2017, 549:269-272.
    [5] HU H W, HE J Z. Comammox-a newly discovered nitrification process in the terrestrial nitrogen cycle[J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2017, 17(12):2709-2717.
    [6] XIA F, WANG J G, ZHU T, et al. Ubiquity and diversity of complete ammonia oxidizers (comammox)[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2018, 84(24):e01390-e01318.
    [7] LIU S, WANG H, CHEN L, et al. Comammox Nitrospira within the Yangtze River continuum:community, biogeography, and ecological drivers[J]. The ISME Journal, 2020,14:2488-2504.
    [8] ZHOU L J, HAN P, ZHAO M, et al. Biotransformation of lincomycin and fluoroquinolone antibiotics by the ammonia oxidizers AOA, AOB and comammox:a comparison of removal, pathways, and mechanisms[J]. Water Research,2021, 196:117003.
    [9] PJEVAC P, SCHAUBERGER C, POGHOSYAN L, et al.AmoA-targeted polymerase chain reaction primers for the specific detection and quantification of comammox Nitrospira in the environment[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology,2017, 8:1508.
    [10] PALOMO A, PEDERSEN A G, FOWLER S J, et al. Comparative genomics sheds light on niche differentiation and the evolutionary history of comammox Nitrospira[J].The ISME Journal, 2018, 12(7):1779-1793.
    [11] GAO W, FU Y, FAN C, et al. Factors predictive of the biogeographic distribution of comammox Nitrospira in terrestrial ecosystems[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2023, 184:109079.
    [12] ZHU G, WANG X, WANG S, et al. Towards a more laborsaving way in microbial ammonium oxidation:a review on complete ammonia oxidization (comammox)[J]. The Science of the Total Environment, 2022, 829:154590.
    [13] KE X, ANGEL R, LU Y, et al. Niche differentiation of ammonia oxidizers and nitrite oxidizers in rice paddy soil[J].Environmental Microbiology, 2013, 15(8):2275-2292.
    [14] XU S, WANG B, LI Y, et al. Ubiquity, diversity, and activity of comammox Nitrospira in agricultural soils[J].The Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 706:135684.
    [15] ZHAO J, BELLO M, MENG Y, et al. Selective inhibition of ammonia oxidising Archaea by simvastatin stimulates growth of ammonia oxidising bacteria[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2020, 141:107673.
    [16] KITS K D, SEDLACEK C J, LEBEDEVA E V, et al.Kinetic analysis of a complete nitrifier reveals an oligotrophic lifestyle[J]. Nature, 2017, 549:269-272.
    [17] HU J, ZHAO Y, YAO X, et al. Dominance of comammox Nitrospira in soil nitrification[J]. The Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 780:146558.
    [18] ORELLANA L H, CHEE-SANFORD J C, SANFORD R A, et al. Year-round shotgun metagenomes reveal stable microbial communities in agricultural soils and novel ammonia oxidizers responding to fertilization[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2018, 84(2):e01646-e01617.
    [19] TAKAHASHI Y, FUJITANI H, HIRONO Y, et al.Enrichment of comammox and nitrite-oxidizing Nitrospira from acidic soils[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology,2020, 11:1737.
    [20] SHEN J P, ZHANG L M, ZHU Y G, et al. Abundance and composition of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and ammonia-oxidizing Archaea communities of an alkaline sandy loam[J]. Environmental Microbiology, 2008, 10(6):1601-1611.
    [21] XIE J, WANG Z, WANG Y, et al. Manure combined with biochar reduces rhizosphere nitrification potential and amoA gene abundance of ammonia-oxidizing microorganisms in acid purple soil[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2023,181:104660.
    [22] LI C, HE Z Y, HU H W, et al. Niche specialization of comammox Nitrospira in terrestrial ecosystems:Oligotrophic or copiotrophic?[J]. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 2023, 53(2):161-176.
    [23] 陈娜,刘毅,肖谋良,等. CO2倍增和施氮对水稻不同生长期土壤反硝化细菌丰度的影响[J].环境科学研究, 2019, 32(4):683-691.
    [24] 石秀丽,郭萌萌,张莹,等.单步硝化作用与全程氨氧化微生物研究进展[J].草业学报, 2018, 27(7):196-203.
    [25] LIU H, HU H, HUANG X, et al. Canonical ammonia oxidizers, rather than comammox Nitrospira, dominated autotrophic nitrification during the mineralization of organic substances in two paddy soils[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2021, 156:108192.
    [26] LIU T, WANG Z, WANG S, et al. Responses of ammoniaoxidizers and comammox to different long-term fertilization regimes in a subtropical paddy soil[J]. European Journal of Soil Biology, 2019, 93:103087.
    [27] WANG J, WANG J, RHODES G, et al. Adaptive responses of comammox Nitrospira and canonical ammonia oxidizers to long-term fertilizations:implications for the relative contributions of different ammonia oxidizers to soil nitrogen cycling[J]. The Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 668:224-233.
    [28] NIE S A, LI H, YANG X, et al. Nitrogen loss by anaerobic oxidation of ammonium in rice rhizosphere[J]. The ISME Journal, 2015, 9(9):2059-2067.
    [29] 鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M]. 3版.北京:中国农业出版社, 2008:39-89.
    [30] BEMAN J M, FRANCIS C A. Diversity of ammoniaoxidizing Archaea and bacteria in the sediments of a hypernutrified subtropical estuary:Bahía del Tóbari,Mexico[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology,2006, 72(12):7767-7777.
    [31] ROTTHAUWE J H, WITZEL K P, LIESACK W. The ammonia monooxygenase structural gene amoA as a functional marker:molecular fine-scale analysis of natural ammonia-oxidizing populations[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1997, 63(12):4704-4712.
    [32] JIANG R, WANG J G, ZHU T, et al. Use of newly designed primers for quantification of complete ammonia-oxidizing (comammox) bacterial clades and strict nitrite oxidizers in the genus Nitrospira[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2020, 86(20):e01775-e01720.
    [33] LI D, REN Z, ZHOU Y, et al. Comammox Nitrospira and ammonia-oxidizing Archaea are dominant ammonia oxidizers in sediments of an acid mine lake containing high ammonium concentrations[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2023, 89(3):e0004723.
    [34] ZHOU X, WANG S, MA S, et al. Effects of commonly used nitrification inhibitors-dicyandiamide (DCD), 3, 4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate (DMPP), and nitrapyrin-on soil nitrogen dynamics and nitrifiers in three typical paddy soils[J]. Geoderma, 2020, 380:114637.
    [35] LI C, HU H W, CHEN Q L, et al. Comammox Nitrospira play an active role in nitrification of agricultural soils amended with nitrogen fertilizers[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2019, 138:107609.
    [36] GAO F, LI Y, FAN H, et al. Main environmental drivers of abundance, diversity and community structure of comammox Nitrospira in paddy soils[J]. Pedosphere,2023, 33(5):808-818.
    [37] LI D, FANG F, LIU G. Efficient nitrification and lowlevel N2O emission in a weakly acidic bioreactor at low dissolved-oxygen levels are due to comammox[J].Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2021, 87(11):e00154-e00121.
    [38] LI C, HU H, CHEN Q, et al. Niche specialization of comammox Nitrospira clade A in terrestrial ecosystems[J].Soil Biology\&Biochemistry, 2021, 156:108231.
    [39] LIN Y, FAN J, HU H W, et al. Differentiation of individual clusters of comammox Nitrospira in an acidic Ultisol following long-term fertilization[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2022, 170:104267.
  • [1] 胡文成, 朱寿松, 王艺璇, 阳达, 陈银华.  木薯茉莉酸氧化酶JOXs基因家族的鉴定及表达模式分析 . 热带生物学报, 2025, 16(): 1-10. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.20240199
    [2] 李安, 马建忠, 任鹏, 邵鑫斌.  槲皮素对赤点石斑鱼生长性能、抗氧化能力和肠道菌群的影响 . 热带生物学报, 2025, 16(1): 152-162. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.20240097
    [3] 林雨彬, 秦永强, 马思远, 曾若菡, 陈雨梅, 刁晓平.  红树林沉积物反硝化和厌氧氨氧化速率的时空变化及环境响应 . 热带生物学报, 2023, 14(1): 129-135. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.2023.01.012
    [4] 王晟, 但建国.  施铁对普通野生稻田甲烷排放的影响 . 热带生物学报, 2022, 13(5): 496-501. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.2022.05.010
    [5] 石婕, 符雪影, 吴强, 梁清干, 朱国鹏, 祝志欣.  甘薯叶片的抗氧化活性和相关成分比较 . 热带生物学报, 2021, 12(4): 466-472. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.2021.04.009
    [6] .  2021 年 2 期目录 . 热带生物学报, 2021, (2): 1-2.
    [7] .  2021 年 3 期目录 . 热带生物学报, 2021, (3): 1-2.
    [8] 陈明洋, 卓小垒, 代佳妮, 于靖, 戚华沙, 吴友根.  产地和果形对槟榔主要活性成分及抗氧化活性的影响 . 热带生物学报, 2020, 11(1): 31-41. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.2020.01.006
    [9] 张唯伟, 董怡, 张传清, 朱国念, 刘亚慧.  稻田常用农药对螟黄赤眼蜂的影响 . 热带生物学报, 2019, 10(3): 283-287. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.2019.03.015
    [10] 王洁, 李花, 骆焱平.  牛角瓜叶乙醇提取物的体外抗氧化活性 . 热带生物学报, 2018, 9(2): 183-188. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.2018.02.009
    [11] 毛楷林, 林芳, 徐腾, 余作挺, 周海龙.  皱瘤海鞘被囊多肽的抗氧化活性 . 热带生物学报, 2017, 8(4): 431-435,458. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.2017.04.010
    [12] 孟凡同, 郑兴, 崔云亮, 王爱民, 顾志峰.  不同用量的呼吸环和陶瓷环处理养殖废水中氨氮的效果 . 热带生物学报, 2017, 8(1): 7-13. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.2017.01.002
    [13] 崔云亮, 顾志峰, 郑兴, 王爱民.  5种滤料在循环养殖系统中去除氨氮效果的比较 . 热带生物学报, 2015, 6(3): 235-241. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.2015.03.002
    [14] 秦垂新, 曹子丰, 谭丽容, 林伟斌.  中药口服液中性、酸性多糖的检测方法 . 热带生物学报, 2014, 5(2): 170-173. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.2014.02.004
    [15] 李奕星, 臧小平, 林兴娥, 袁德保, 谭琳, 梁冬梅, 马蔚红.  宽叶十万错抗氧化性测定 . 热带生物学报, 2014, 5(4): 388-391. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.2014.04.014
    [16] 向赟, 王刚, 龚永, 陈兆明, 张锐, 孙成波.  氨氮质量浓度对感染白斑综合症病毒的凡纳滨对虾的影响 . 热带生物学报, 2014, 5(3): 220-227. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.2014.03.003
    [17] 黄洋, 黄海立, 李东, 孙成波, 刘志刚.  尖紫蛤体质量和海水温度对其耗氧率和排氨率的影响 . 热带生物学报, 2013, 4(1): 11-16. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.2013.01.016
    [18] 曹玉鑫, 花龙, 赵天龙, 李明容, 夏志辉.  Xa21全生育期表达载体的构建 . 热带生物学报, 2013, 4(2): 133-137,145. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.2013.02.001
    [19] 罗文杰, 袁潜华, 张加, 宋忠华, 周玉, 何美丹.  两系杂交水稻组合Y58S/9311亲本的生育特性观察 . 热带生物学报, 2012, 3(1): 56-58. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.2012.01.011
    [20] 张洁, 董荣书, 黄艳霞, 郇恒福, 刘国道.  酸性条件下接种根瘤菌对热研2号柱花草产量及含氮量的影响 . 热带生物学报, 2012, 3(3): 232-235. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.2012.03.009
  • 加载中
    • WeChat 点击查看大图
    计量
    • 文章访问数:  184
    • HTML全文浏览量:  34
    • PDF下载量:  10
    • 被引次数: 0
    出版历程
    • 收稿日期:  2023-11-28
    • 修回日期:  2024-02-25

    酸性稻田全程氨氧化菌对氮肥施加的响应

    doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.20230128
    • 1. 海南大学 生态与环境学院, 海口 570228;
    • 2. 中国热带农业科学院 环境与植物保护研究所, 海口 571101;
    • 3. 海南儋州热带农业生态系统国家野外科学观测研究站, 海南 儋州 571737
      • 基金项目:

      广东省基础与应用基础研究基金项目(2022A1515010804)

      中国热带农业科学院基本科研业务费专项(1630042022001)

      海南省重点研发计划项目(ZDYF2021XDNY280)

      作者简介:

      付亚军(1998-),男,海南大学生态与环境学院2021级硕士研究生。E-mail:f1056603026@163.com

      通讯作者: 陈淼(1985-),男,博士,副研究员。研究方向:农田土壤碳氮循环。E-mail:cataseppiael@163.com
    • 收稿日期: 2023-11-28
    • 修回日期: 2024-02-25

    • 中图分类号: S511

    摘要: 为了揭示酸性稻田全程、半程氨氧化菌对增氮的响应与敏感性差异，通过盆栽实验，设置施加氮肥处理，测定分蘖期、抽穗期、成熟期全程及半程氨氧化菌的丰度，比较全程、半程氨氧化菌对施肥的响应敏感性。结果表明：未施肥与施肥情形下，分蘖期、抽穗期、成熟期土壤氨氧化菌的优势种群均为全程氨氧化菌(Clade A:3.24×108～7.24×108 copies·g-1,Clade B:2.14×108～1.48×109 copies·g-1)而非半程氨氧化菌(AOA:2.00×107～4.37×107 copies·g-1,AOB:1.35×107～3.31×107 copies·g-1)。施肥的主效应（Clade A:P=0.762,Clade B：氮素利用率=0.398）、生育期的主效应（Clade A:P=0.264,Clade B:P=0.237）、施肥与生育期的交互效应（Clade A:P=0.316,Clade B:P=0.294）均不显著，即全程氨氧化菌两大分支A和B季节变化并不显著，二者对尿素施加的响应并不敏感。未施氮肥与施加氮肥的情形下全程氨氧化菌丰度的环境调控因子可能有所不同。未施氮肥情形下，全程氨氧化菌的2个分支A（Clade A:R=-0.73,P=0.027）和B（Clade B:R=-0.75,P=0.019）的丰度均与土壤总氮含量呈负相关，预示着无外源性氮输入情形下，全程氨氧化菌的生长受土壤有机氮、氨化作用和游离氨负向调控。施加氮肥情形下，全程氨氧化菌尤其是分支A的丰度可能更多地受土壤p H、氧化还原电位（Eh）及NH4+-N含量的影响。氮肥的施加显著影响全程、半程氨氧化菌的群落共变性，致使Clade B丰度与AOA、AOB丰度的正向共变趋势消失。

    English Abstract

    付亚军, 高文龙, 陈淼. 酸性稻田全程氨氧化菌对氮肥施加的响应[J]. 热带生物学报, 2024, 15(5): 509-519. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.20230128
    引用本文: 付亚军, 高文龙, 陈淼. 酸性稻田全程氨氧化菌对氮肥施加的响应[J]. 热带生物学报, 2024, 15(5): 509-519. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.20230128
    shu
    FU Yajun, GAO Wenlong, CHEN Miao. Response of comammox Nitrospira to nitrogen fertilization in acidic paddy soil[J]. Journal of Tropical Biology, 2024, 15(5): 509-519. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.20230128
    Citation: FU Yajun, GAO Wenlong, CHEN Miao. Response of comammox Nitrospira to nitrogen fertilization in acidic paddy soil[J]. Journal of Tropical Biology, 2024, 15(5): 509-519. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.20230128
    shu

      全文HTML

    参考文献 (39)

    目录

      /

      返回文章
      返回

      版权所有：《热带生物学报》编辑部

      编辑部地址: 海南省海口市人民大道58号邮编: 100101电话: 0898-66281595

      本系统由 北京仁和汇智信息技术有限公司 开发   百度统计

      x 关闭 永久关闭

      严正声明

      于召开《热带生物学报（中英文）》成立首届青年编委会 暨第一次工作会第二轮会议通知

      关于召开《热带生物学报》（中英文）成立首届青年编委会暨第一次工作会第一轮会议通知

      《热带生物学报（中英文）》编辑部赴海南国家公园研究院调研交流

      喜报！《热带生物学报》被CABI数据库收录