Message Board

Respected readers, authors and reviewers, you can add comments to this page on any questions about the contribution, review, editing and publication of this journal. We will give you an answer as soon as possible. Thank you for your support!

Name
E-mail
Phone
Title
Content
Verification Code
Volume 15 Issue 5
Sep.  2024
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents

HUANG Liting, LAI Junxiang, ZHANG Rongcan, MENG Beijun, XU Mingben. Community structure of macrobenthos in Tieshangang seawaters of Beihai city[J]. Journal of Tropical Biology, 2024, 15(5): 586-598. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.20230109
Citation: HUANG Liting, LAI Junxiang, ZHANG Rongcan, MENG Beijun, XU Mingben. Community structure of macrobenthos in Tieshangang seawaters of Beihai city[J]. Journal of Tropical Biology, 2024, 15(5): 586-598. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.20230109

Community structure of macrobenthos in Tieshangang seawaters of Beihai city

doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.20230109
  • Received Date: 2023-09-15
  • Rev Recd Date: 2024-03-11
  • In March 2021 and September 2021, a survey of macrobenthos was carried out in Tieshangang seawaters of Beihai city. Samples from 24 stations were collected in the seawaters, and used for species identification, and the density, biomass and Bray-curtis similarity coefficient of macrobenthos species and sediment quality were analyzed. The abundance/biomass curve(ABC curve) of macrobenthos were plotted and the disturbance of macrobenthos was analyzed. The results showed that a total of 42 species of macrobenthos were collected, including 19 of annelidas, 11 of arthropods, 6 of mollusks, 2 of echinoderms and chordates, and 1 of neoglyphs and cnidarians each. The average density and average biomass of macrobenthic animals were 141 ind·m-2 and 96.95 g·m-2. The dominant species were Ruditapes philippinarum and Xenophthalmus pinnotheroides in spring and Branchiostoma belcheri in autumn. The average value of Shannon-Wiener index(H')was 1.73 in spring and 1.25 in autumn. The standard index of each evaluation factor of sediment was less than 1.The ABC analysis showed that all the stations were not disturbed except for F06 station, which was moderately disturbed in spring. All stations were undisturbed in autumn. In general, the macrobenthos community in the survey seawaters was stable. The cluster analysis and MDS analysis showed that the community similarity of each station was low in spring and in autumn.
  • [1] 高霆炜,杨明柳,宋超.海岸工程对北海铁山港红树林大型底栖动物群落的影响[J].广西科学院学报, 2021,37(3):299-306.
    [2] 李轶平,刘修泽,王彬,等.辽东湾海域大型底栖动物群落特征[J].海洋渔业, 2017, 39(3):267-276.
    [3] BEZMATERNYKH D M, KRYLOVA E N. Macrozoobenthos in the Gilevsk Reservoir and adjacent reaches of the Alei River (Altai Krai)[J]. Inland Water Biology, 2016, 9(2):160-166.
    [4] KOCHUROVA T I, KANTOR G Y. Macrozoobenthos in the middle course of the Vyatka River in the area of a Chemical-Weapons Destruction Facility[J]. Inland Water Biology, 2013, 6(4):322-330.
    [5] 陈旭阳,刘保良.广西铁山港海域沉积物重金属污染状况及潜在生态风险评价[J].海洋通报, 2012, 31(3):297-301.
    [6] 张云吉,王凤,金秉福.广西铁山港表层沉积物碎屑矿物组成、分布及水动力环境分析[J].海洋科学, 2013,37(6):95-101.
    [7] 蓝文陆,李天深,韩丽君.广西铁山港附近海域营养盐分布及其季节变化[J].海洋科学, 2014, 38(7):63-69.
    [8] 于凌宇,张文静,林元烧,等.广西铁山港海域砂壳纤毛虫生态学研究[J].安全与环境工程, 2014, 21(3):12-17.
    [9] 国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会.海洋监测规范第7部分:近海污染生态调查和生物监测:GB 17378.7-2007[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2008.
    [10] 江艳娥,林昭进,黄梓荣.南海北部大陆架区渔业生物多样性研究[J].南方水产, 2009, 5(5):32-37.
    [11] 韩浩,张志南,于子山.渤海中、南部大型底栖动物的群落结构[J].生态学报,2004,24(3):531-537.
    [12] 王迪,陈丕茂,马媛.钦州湾大型底栖动物生态学研究[J].生态学报, 2011, 31(16):4768-4777.
    [13] 李宝泉,李新正,王洪法,等.长江口附近海域大型底栖动物群落特征[J].动物学报, 2007, 53(1):76-82.
    [14] 田胜艳,于子山,刘晓收,等.丰度/生物量比较曲线法监测大型底栖动物群落受污染扰动的研究[J].海洋通报, 2006, 25(1):92-96.
    [15] 李少月,隋吉星,曲方圆,等.辽东湾六股河口邻近海域冬季大型底栖动物生态学特征[J].海洋科学进展,2016, 34(1):95-105.
    [16] 贺湛斐,童春富.太浦河大型底栖动物群落组成及时空分布特征[J].生态学报, 2023, 43(11):4619-4631.
    [17] 赵凡淇,刘卫霞,隋吉星,等.秋季山东南部近岸海域大型底栖动物群落特征[J].海洋科学进展, 2018, 36(1):117-127.
    [18] 李北兴,黎傲雪,董建宇,等.湛江湾潮间带大型底栖动物的群落结构及其受干扰程度[J].南方水产科学,2023, 19(2):12-20.
    [19] 徐阁,王德鸿,王诗文,等.西沙永兴岛附近海域沉积物的环境质量评价[J].海洋学报, 2022, 44(1):137-146.
    [20] WARWICK R M. A new method for detecting pollution effects on marine macrobenthic communities[J]. Marine Biology, 1986, 92(4):557-562.
    [21] 中国海湾志编篡委员会.中国海湾志第十二分册(广西海湾)[M].北京:海洋出版社,1993.
    [22] 吴斌,宋金明,李学刚.黄河口大型底栖动物群落结构特征及其与环境因子的耦合分析[J].海洋学报, 2014,36(4):62-72.
    [23] 高爱根,陈全震,胡锡钢,等.象山港网箱养鱼区大型底栖生物生态特征[J].海洋学报, 2005, 27(4):108-113.
    [24] Pearson T H, Black K D. The environmental impact of marine fish cage culture[M]. Black K D. Environmental Impacts of Aquaculture. Sheffield:Sheffield Academic Press,2001:1-31.
    [25] 蔡文倩,孟伟,刘录三,等.渤海湾大型底栖动物群落优势种长期变化研究[J].环境科学学报, 2013, 33(8):2332-2340.
    [26] 刘录三,孟伟,田自强,等.长江口及毗邻海域大型底栖动物的空间分布与历史演变[J].生态学报, 2008, 28(7):3027-3034.
    [27] 刘录三,郑丙辉,李宝泉,等.长江口大型底栖动物群落的演变过程及原因探讨[J].海洋学报, 2012, 34(3):134-145.
    [28] 刘旭东,孙立娥,张晓红,等.渤海海域夏季大型底栖动物群落特征[J].中国环境监测, 2019, 35(3):120-127.
    [29] 蔡文倩,孟伟,刘录三,等.春季渤海湾大型底栖动物群落结构特征研究[J].环境科学学报, 2013, 33(5):1458-1466.
    [30]
    [31]
    [32] 王超,张伶.航道疏浚对珠江口附近海洋生态环境影响及预防措施[J].海洋环境科学, 2001, 20(4):58-60.
    [33] 董双武.航道疏浚对海洋生态环境的影响及预防措施研究[J].低碳世界, 2013(14):134-135.
    [34] 何斌源,邓朝亮,罗砚.环境扰动对钦州港潮间带大型底栖动物群落的影响[J].广西科学, 2004, 11(2):143-147.
    [35] 王宗兴,孙丕喜,姜美洁,等.钦州湾秋季大型底栖动物多样性研究[J].广西科学, 2010, 17(1):89-92.
    [36] 崔雯瑶,杨湘君,张蒙生,等.胶州湾春季大型底栖生物多样性及群落结构特征[J].海洋科学, 2020, 44(6):101-109.
    [37] 钟海霞,曲方圆,隋吉星,等.山东南部近海春季大型底栖动物丰度、生物量及群落结构研究[J].海洋通报, 2018, 37(1):88-98.
    [38] 袁涛萍,李恒翔,李路,等.夏季大亚湾大型底栖动物群落结构[J].热带海洋学报, 2017, 36(1):41-47.
    [39] 王全超,李宝泉.烟台近海大型底栖动物群落特征[J].海洋与湖沼, 2013, 44(6):1667-1680.
  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article views(35) PDF downloads(2) Cited by()

Proportional views
Related

Community structure of macrobenthos in Tieshangang seawaters of Beihai city

doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.20230109

Abstract: In March 2021 and September 2021, a survey of macrobenthos was carried out in Tieshangang seawaters of Beihai city. Samples from 24 stations were collected in the seawaters, and used for species identification, and the density, biomass and Bray-curtis similarity coefficient of macrobenthos species and sediment quality were analyzed. The abundance/biomass curve(ABC curve) of macrobenthos were plotted and the disturbance of macrobenthos was analyzed. The results showed that a total of 42 species of macrobenthos were collected, including 19 of annelidas, 11 of arthropods, 6 of mollusks, 2 of echinoderms and chordates, and 1 of neoglyphs and cnidarians each. The average density and average biomass of macrobenthic animals were 141 ind·m-2 and 96.95 g·m-2. The dominant species were Ruditapes philippinarum and Xenophthalmus pinnotheroides in spring and Branchiostoma belcheri in autumn. The average value of Shannon-Wiener index(H')was 1.73 in spring and 1.25 in autumn. The standard index of each evaluation factor of sediment was less than 1.The ABC analysis showed that all the stations were not disturbed except for F06 station, which was moderately disturbed in spring. All stations were undisturbed in autumn. In general, the macrobenthos community in the survey seawaters was stable. The cluster analysis and MDS analysis showed that the community similarity of each station was low in spring and in autumn.

HUANG Liting, LAI Junxiang, ZHANG Rongcan, MENG Beijun, XU Mingben. Community structure of macrobenthos in Tieshangang seawaters of Beihai city[J]. Journal of Tropical Biology, 2024, 15(5): 586-598. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.20230109
Citation: HUANG Liting, LAI Junxiang, ZHANG Rongcan, MENG Beijun, XU Mingben. Community structure of macrobenthos in Tieshangang seawaters of Beihai city[J]. Journal of Tropical Biology, 2024, 15(5): 586-598. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.20230109
Reference (39)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return