Anatomical traits of leaves in 21 clones of <i>Hevea brasiliensis</i>

YANG Yu; HU Xinxin; DING Shitao; YUAN Zhineng; HUANG Xiao; OUYANG Yujun; GAO Xinsheng

doi:10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.20230137

Message Board

Respected readers, authors and reviewers, you can add comments to this page on any questions about the contribution, review, editing and publication of this journal. We will give you an answer as soon as possible. Thank you for your support!

Name

E-mail

Phone

Title

Content

Verification Code

Volume 15 Issue 4

Jul. 2024

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of Tropical Biology > 2024 > 15(4): 373-381

YANG Yu, HU Xinxin, DING Shitao, YUAN Zhineng, HUANG Xiao, OUYANG Yujun, GAO Xinsheng. Anatomical traits of leaves in 21 clones of Hevea brasiliensis[J]. Journal of Tropical Biology, 2024, 15(4): 373-381. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.20230137

Citation:

YANG Yu, HU Xinxin, DING Shitao, YUAN Zhineng, HUANG Xiao, OUYANG Yujun, GAO Xinsheng. Anatomical traits of leaves in 21 clones of Hevea brasiliensis[J]. Journal of Tropical Biology, 2024, 15(4): 373-381. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.20230137

Anatomical traits of leaves in 21 clones of Hevea brasiliensis

doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.20230137

1. Rubber Research Institute, CATAS, Haikou, Hainan 571101;
2. Guangdong Agribusiness Tropical Agriculture Institute Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, Guangdong 511365;
3. School of Tropical Agriculture and Forestry, Hainan University, Haikou, Hainan 570228, China

Received Date: 2023-12-11
Rev Recd Date: 2024-02-28
Publish Date: 2024-07-25

Abstract

In order to understand the anatomical traits of leaves among rubber clones of Hevea brasiliensis in China and provide basis for breeding and adaptability evaluation of clones with high photosynthetic efficiency, 21main Hevea clones in China, such as ‘Reyan 73397’, ‘Reyan 917’, etc., were used for anatomical analysis, and their leaf structural traits such as the ratio of palisade tissue thickness to spongy tissue thickness, leaf thickness,stomatal density, etc., were observed by using paraffin sectioning and nail polish imprinting. The results showed that there were significant differences in leaf structural traits among the main clones. The clones ‘Nanhua 1’,‘Hongxing 1’ and ‘Reyan 917’ were higher in palisade tissue thickness, leaf thickness and ratio of palisade tissue to spongy tissue, whereas the clones ‘Reyan 879’, ‘Reken 628’ and ‘Reyan 106’ were relatively lower in stomatal length, stomatal width and stomatal density, which suggested that they had a higher photosynthetic capacity and certain drought resistance ability. Hierarchical clustering showed the aforesaid clones were divided into two groups. The clones ‘Nanhua 1’, ‘Hongxing 1’, ‘Haiken 1’ and ‘Reyan 917’ were relatively higher in leaf thickness, palisade tissue and density of the tissue structure. In summary, clones ‘Nanhua 1’,‘ Hongxing 1’and ‘Reyan 917’were higher in leaf thickness, palisade tissue thickness, density of tissue structure, and were small and dense in stomata. It is hence speculated that these three clones have higher photosynthetic performance, which needs further research. At the same time, this analysis also provides a technical basis for further study of the environmental adaptability and gas exchange characteristics of the above-mentioned clones.
- Hevea brasiliensis,
- leaf anatomy,
- Cluster analysis

References

[1]	邱彦芬,亚华金,杨湉,等.橡胶树无性系光合特性及叶片解剖结构比较[J].热带农业科技, 2021, 44(4):1-5.
[2]	王新靓,卢杰.植物叶片解剖结构与光合作用研究概况[J].农业与技术, 2023, 43(16):78-82.
[3]	闫彩霞,刘俊龙,苗婷婷,等.基于叶片解剖结构的12个香椿无性系抗旱性评价[J].分子植物育种, 2023,21(17):5824-5833.
[4]	杨森,张晓飞,高新生,等. 5个品系橡胶树叶片解剖结构及其抗旱性分析[J].热带生物学报, 2017, 8(3):301-306.
[5]	潘昕,邱权,李吉跃,等.基于叶片解剖结构对青藏高原25种灌木的抗旱性评价[J].华南农业大学学报, 2015,36(2):61-68.
[6]	周志雄,王龙远,郭微,等. 7种秋海棠属植物叶片解剖结构分析与耐热性评价[J].广东农业科学, 2023, 50(9):173-180.
[7]	张俊环,张美玲,杨丽,等.基于叶片显微结构综合评价杏不同品种(系)的抗旱性[J].果树学报, 2023, 40(11):2381-2390.
[8]	雷怡,高静,王琪,等.弱光对南北大豆品种叶片结构与光合特性的影响[J].四川农业大学学报, 2023, 41(5):755-764.
[9]	潘莹萍,陈亚鹏,王怀军,等.胡杨(Populus euphratica)叶片结构与功能关系[J].中国沙漠, 2018, 38(4):765-771.
[10]	张源源,郭涵,袁红章,等.橡胶树不同倍数的气孔性状差异研究[J].热带作物学报. 2017, 38(3):389-394.
[11]	吴春霞,杨静慧,索何风,等. 3种海棠叶片解剖结构与抗旱性的关系[J].天津农业学报. 2016, 22(12),11-14.
[12]	刘博,谭军,孟繁瑞,等.糖槭光合速率和气孔导度对光合有效辐射的响应[J].河北农业科学, 2018, 22(3):14-19.
[13]	夏振华,陈亚宁,朱成刚,等.干旱胁迫环境下的胡杨叶片气孔变化[J].干旱区研究, 2018, 35(5):1111-1117.
[14]	DRAKE P L, FROEND R H, FRANKS P J. Smaller,faster stomata:scaling of stomatal size, rate of response,and stomatal conductance[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2013, 64(2):495-505.
[15]	CARINS MURPHY M R, JORDAN G J, BRODRIBB T J.Acclimation to humidity modifies the link between leaf size and the density of veins and stomata[J]. Plant, Cell&Environment, 2014, 37(1):124-131.
[16]	刘德政,卢山,高珅奥,等.大田和旱棚环境下小麦旗叶气孔性状变异及其与光合参数的关系[J].麦类作物学报, 2024,44(3):360-369.
[17]	魏丽萍,田耀华,周会平,等.遮荫处理对不同品种橡胶树叶片解剖特征和生长的影响[J].热带作物学报,2019, 40(1):45-53.
[18]	邱彦芬,杨湉,李小琴,等.橡胶树无性系叶片解剖结构及耐旱性研究[J].西部林业科学, 2020, 49(1):92-98.
[19]	燕玲,李红,贺晓,等.阿拉善地区9种珍稀濒危植物营养器官生态解剖观察[J].内蒙古农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2000, 21(3 ):65-71.
[20]	张义,王得祥,宋彬,等.基于叶片解剖结构的西宁市11种城市森林植物抗旱性评价.西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版).
[21]	MA M, ZHAO C Z, KANG M P, et al. Periploca sepium leaf dry weight, area, and thickness scale differently under different light environments in Taohe riparian forests[J]. Flora, 2023, 301:152255.
[22]	XU R, CHENG S, ZHOU J, et al. Intraspecific variations in leaf functional traits of Cunninghamia lanceolata provenances[J]. BMC Plant Biology, 2023, 23(1):92.
[23]	隋利,王康才,梁永富,等.紫苏叶片解剖结构、花色苷含量与光合特性的关系[J].生态学杂志, 2017,36(6):1590-1596.
[24]	张丹丹.胡杨异形叶叶脉网络性状与叶形态、光合生理功能的关系[D].塔里木:塔里木大学, 2023.
[25]	徐扬,陈小红,赵安玖.川西高原4种苹果属植物叶片解剖结构与其抗旱性分析[J].西北植物学报, 2015, 35(11):2227-2234.
[26]	徐艳芳,贺雅萍,王梦瑶,等. 16个建兰品种叶片解剖结构研究[J].热带作物学报, 2022, 43(10):2099-2105.
[27]	AASAMAA K, SõBER A, RAHI M. Leaf anatomical characteristics associateeaf water status in temperate deciduous trees. Aust J Plant Physiol, 2001, 28:765-774.
[28]	李盛蓝,谭婷婷,范元芳,等.玉米荫蔽对大豆光合特性与叶脉、气孔特征的影响[J].中国农业科学, 2019,52(21):3782-3793.
[29]	吴胜男,孙凯,张海,等.甘薯不同品种(系)的光合特性比较与聚类分析[J].分子植物育种, 2023, 21(21):7153-7160.
[30]	李伟明,吴旭东,胡卫丛,等.基于主成分分析和聚类分析的不同品种辣椒综合评价[J].北方园艺, 2022(9):55-60.
[31]

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views(17) PDF downloads(2) Cited by()

Proportional views

Anatomical traits of leaves in 21 clones of Hevea brasiliensis

1. Rubber Research Institute, CATAS, Haikou, Hainan 571101;

2. Guangdong Agribusiness Tropical Agriculture Institute Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, Guangdong 511365;

3. School of Tropical Agriculture and Forestry, Hainan University, Haikou, Hainan 570228, China

Received Date: 2023-12-11

Rev Recd Date: 2024-02-28

Publish Date: 2024-07-25

Key words:

Abstract: In order to understand the anatomical traits of leaves among rubber clones of Hevea brasiliensis in China and provide basis for breeding and adaptability evaluation of clones with high photosynthetic efficiency, 21main Hevea clones in China, such as ‘Reyan 73397’, ‘Reyan 917’, etc., were used for anatomical analysis, and their leaf structural traits such as the ratio of palisade tissue thickness to spongy tissue thickness, leaf thickness,stomatal density, etc., were observed by using paraffin sectioning and nail polish imprinting. The results showed that there were significant differences in leaf structural traits among the main clones. The clones ‘Nanhua 1’,‘Hongxing 1’ and ‘Reyan 917’ were higher in palisade tissue thickness, leaf thickness and ratio of palisade tissue to spongy tissue, whereas the clones ‘Reyan 879’, ‘Reken 628’ and ‘Reyan 106’ were relatively lower in stomatal length, stomatal width and stomatal density, which suggested that they had a higher photosynthetic capacity and certain drought resistance ability. Hierarchical clustering showed the aforesaid clones were divided into two groups. The clones ‘Nanhua 1’, ‘Hongxing 1’, ‘Haiken 1’ and ‘Reyan 917’ were relatively higher in leaf thickness, palisade tissue and density of the tissue structure. In summary, clones ‘Nanhua 1’,‘ Hongxing 1’and ‘Reyan 917’were higher in leaf thickness, palisade tissue thickness, density of tissue structure, and were small and dense in stomata. It is hence speculated that these three clones have higher photosynthetic performance, which needs further research. At the same time, this analysis also provides a technical basis for further study of the environmental adaptability and gas exchange characteristics of the above-mentioned clones.

HTML

Reference (31)

[1]	邱彦芬,亚华金,杨湉,等.橡胶树无性系光合特性及叶片解剖结构比较[J].热带农业科技, 2021, 44(4):1-5.
[2]	王新靓,卢杰.植物叶片解剖结构与光合作用研究概况[J].农业与技术, 2023, 43(16):78-82.
[3]	闫彩霞,刘俊龙,苗婷婷,等.基于叶片解剖结构的12个香椿无性系抗旱性评价[J].分子植物育种, 2023,21(17):5824-5833.
[4]	杨森,张晓飞,高新生,等. 5个品系橡胶树叶片解剖结构及其抗旱性分析[J].热带生物学报, 2017, 8(3):301-306.
[5]	潘昕,邱权,李吉跃,等.基于叶片解剖结构对青藏高原25种灌木的抗旱性评价[J].华南农业大学学报, 2015,36(2):61-68.
[6]	周志雄,王龙远,郭微,等. 7种秋海棠属植物叶片解剖结构分析与耐热性评价[J].广东农业科学, 2023, 50(9):173-180.
[7]	张俊环,张美玲,杨丽,等.基于叶片显微结构综合评价杏不同品种(系)的抗旱性[J].果树学报, 2023, 40(11):2381-2390.
[8]	雷怡,高静,王琪,等.弱光对南北大豆品种叶片结构与光合特性的影响[J].四川农业大学学报, 2023, 41(5):755-764.
[9]	潘莹萍,陈亚鹏,王怀军,等.胡杨(Populus euphratica)叶片结构与功能关系[J].中国沙漠, 2018, 38(4):765-771.
[10]	张源源,郭涵,袁红章,等.橡胶树不同倍数的气孔性状差异研究[J].热带作物学报. 2017, 38(3):389-394.
[11]	吴春霞,杨静慧,索何风,等. 3种海棠叶片解剖结构与抗旱性的关系[J].天津农业学报. 2016, 22(12),11-14.
[12]	刘博,谭军,孟繁瑞,等.糖槭光合速率和气孔导度对光合有效辐射的响应[J].河北农业科学, 2018, 22(3):14-19.
[13]	夏振华,陈亚宁,朱成刚,等.干旱胁迫环境下的胡杨叶片气孔变化[J].干旱区研究, 2018, 35(5):1111-1117.
[14]	DRAKE P L, FROEND R H, FRANKS P J. Smaller,faster stomata:scaling of stomatal size, rate of response,and stomatal conductance[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2013, 64(2):495-505.
[15]	CARINS MURPHY M R, JORDAN G J, BRODRIBB T J.Acclimation to humidity modifies the link between leaf size and the density of veins and stomata[J]. Plant, Cell&Environment, 2014, 37(1):124-131.
[16]	刘德政,卢山,高珅奥,等.大田和旱棚环境下小麦旗叶气孔性状变异及其与光合参数的关系[J].麦类作物学报, 2024,44(3):360-369.
[17]	魏丽萍,田耀华,周会平,等.遮荫处理对不同品种橡胶树叶片解剖特征和生长的影响[J].热带作物学报,2019, 40(1):45-53.
[18]	邱彦芬,杨湉,李小琴,等.橡胶树无性系叶片解剖结构及耐旱性研究[J].西部林业科学, 2020, 49(1):92-98.
[19]	燕玲,李红,贺晓,等.阿拉善地区9种珍稀濒危植物营养器官生态解剖观察[J].内蒙古农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2000, 21(3	):65-71.
[20]	张义,王得祥,宋彬,等.基于叶片解剖结构的西宁市11种	城市森林植物抗旱性评价.西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版).
[21]	MA M, ZHAO C Z, KANG M P, et al. Periploca sepium leaf dry weight, area, and thickness scale differently under different light environments in Taohe riparian forests[J]. Flora, 2023, 301:152255.
[22]	XU R, CHENG S, ZHOU J, et al. Intraspecific variations in leaf functional traits of Cunninghamia lanceolata provenances[J]. BMC Plant Biology, 2023, 23(1):92.
[23]	隋利,王康才,梁永富,等.紫苏叶片解剖结构、花色苷含量与光合特性的关系[J].生态学杂志, 2017,36(6):1590-1596.
[24]	张丹丹.胡杨异形叶叶脉网络性状与叶形态、光合生理功能的关系[D].塔里木:塔里木大学, 2023.
[25]	徐扬,陈小红,赵安玖.川西高原4种苹果属植物叶片解剖结构与其抗旱性分析[J].西北植物学报, 2015, 35(11):2227-2234.
[26]	徐艳芳,贺雅萍,王梦瑶,等. 16个建兰品种叶片解剖结构研究[J].热带作物学报, 2022, 43(10):2099-2105.
[27]	AASAMAA K, SõBER A, RAHI M. Leaf anatomical characteristics associateeaf water status in temperate deciduous trees. Aust J Plant Physiol, 2001, 28:765-774.
[28]	李盛蓝,谭婷婷,范元芳,等.玉米荫蔽对大豆光合特性与叶脉、气孔特征的影响[J].中国农业科学, 2019,52(21):3782-3793.
[29]	吴胜男,孙凯,张海,等.甘薯不同品种(系)的光合特性比较与聚类分析[J].分子植物育种, 2023, 21(21):7153-7160.
[30]	李伟明,吴旭东,胡卫丛,等.基于主成分分析和聚类分析的不同品种辣椒综合评价[J].北方园艺, 2022(9):55-60.
[31]

Message Board

Anatomical traits of leaves in 21 clones of Hevea brasiliensis

doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.20230137

Abstract

References

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Proportional views

Related

Anatomical traits of leaves in 21 clones of Hevea brasiliensis

doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.20230137

1. Rubber Research Institute, CATAS, Haikou, Hainan 571101;

2. Guangdong Agribusiness Tropical Agriculture Institute Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, Guangdong 511365;

3. School of Tropical Agriculture and Forestry, Hainan University, Haikou, Hainan 570228, China

HTML

Catalog

Message Board

Anatomical traits of leaves in 21 clones of Hevea brasiliensis

doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.20230137

Abstract

References

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Proportional views

Related

Anatomical traits of leaves in 21 clones of Hevea brasiliensis

doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.20230137

1. Rubber Research Institute, CATAS, Haikou, Hainan 571101; 2. Guangdong Agribusiness Tropical Agriculture Institute Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, Guangdong 511365; 3. School of Tropical Agriculture and Forestry, Hainan University, Haikou, Hainan 570228, China

HTML

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content

1. Rubber Research Institute, CATAS, Haikou, Hainan 571101;

2. Guangdong Agribusiness Tropical Agriculture Institute Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, Guangdong 511365;

3. School of Tropical Agriculture and Forestry, Hainan University, Haikou, Hainan 570228, China