Message Board

Respected readers, authors and reviewers, you can add comments to this page on any questions about the contribution, review, editing and publication of this journal. We will give you an answer as soon as possible. Thank you for your support!

Name
E-mail
Phone
Title
Content
Verification Code
Volume 10 Issue 3
May  2019
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents

TIAN Xiangrong, LI Yantao, WANG Zhihui, Lin Jun, GAO Xiaobao, WU Hua, HE Jun. Field Efficiency of Five Botanical Pesticides against Empoasca vitis Gothe[J]. Journal of Tropical Biology, 2019, 10(3): 264-267. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.2019.03.010
Citation: TIAN Xiangrong, LI Yantao, WANG Zhihui, Lin Jun, GAO Xiaobao, WU Hua, HE Jun. Field Efficiency of Five Botanical Pesticides against Empoasca vitis Gothe[J]. Journal of Tropical Biology, 2019, 10(3): 264-267. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.2019.03.010

Field Efficiency of Five Botanical Pesticides against Empoasca vitis Gothe

doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.2019.03.010
  • Received Date: 2019-06-20
  • Empoasca vitis Gothe is the dominant population of the Empoasca flavescens Fab. It is also the main pest infesting tea trees in Shaanxi Province. Five plant-derived pesticides including 0.6% matrine aqueous solution(AS), 1.3% matrine aqueous solution(AS), 1.5% pyrethrin emulsion in water(EW), tea cicada killer and 0.5% veratrine soluble liquid agent(SL) were used to treat tea trees infested with. E.vitis to observe their field efficiency against E.vitis. The result indicated that 0.6% matrine AS, 1.3% matrine AS and 1.5% pyrethrin EW almost had no control effect against E.vitis. Tea cicada killer and 0.5% veratrine(SL) showed a good control effect against the pest, and had respective control effects of 57.0% and 32.4% after 1 day of treatment, 63.2% and 60.2% after 3 days of treatment, and 86.9% and 70.6% after 7 days of treatment. These results provide a new choice of bioinsecticide for the prevention and control of the main insect pest E.vitis in the field.
  • [1] 王庆森, 王定锋, 吴光远.我国茶树假眼小绿叶蝉研究进展[J].福建农业学报, 2013, 28 (6):615-623.
    [2] 关瑞峰.茶假眼小绿叶蝉发生为害特点调查研究[J].中国植保导刊, 2006, 26 (6):38-40.
    [3]
    [4] 罗智斌, 刘仲贤.西乡县茶产业发展现状及对策[J].中国茶叶加工, 2016 (5):23-26.
    [5] 牛永浩, 陈宏, 王渊, 等.陕西茶叶病虫害绿色防控技术发展现状[J].陕西农业科学, 2018, 64 (2):76-78.
    [6] 魏焕志, 吴晔.汉中茶树病虫害绿色防控技术初探[J].陕西农业科学, 2018, 64 (12):76-79.
    [7] 魏进, 段婷婷, 朱淮武, 等.假眼小绿叶蝉的发生规律及化学防治[J].贵州农业科学, 2011, 39 (5):144-146.
    [8] 雷国明.茶叶虫害发生的种类和药剂防治[J].植物医生, 2005, 18 (2):27.
    [9] 徐荣文.茶假眼小绿叶蝉综合防治技术[J].福建农业科技, 2013, (7):56-58.
    [10] 张兴, 马志卿, 冯俊涛, 等.植物源农药研究进展[J].中国生物防治学报, 2015, 31 (5):685-698.
    [11] 庄家祥.两种植物源农药防治茶假眼小绿叶蝉药效试验 [J].湖北植保, 2015 (1):24-39.
    [12] 李喜旺, 张瑾, 辛肇军, 等.烟碱对假眼小绿叶蝉和茶尺蠖的忌避 (拒食) 活性[J].应用昆虫学报, 2016, 53 (3):528-535.
    [13] 钮羽群, 王梦馨, 崔林, 等.迷迭香挥发物不同组合对假眼小绿叶蝉行为的调[J].生态学报, 2015, 35 (7):2380-2387.
    [14] 赵之德, 李嘉慧, 梁涛, 等.联苯菊酯、溴氰菊酯、虫螨腈对茶园害虫的田间防效[J].农药, 2019, 58 (2):130-135.
    [15] 李万里, 包亚星, 林晓婷, 等.应用白僵菌与绿僵菌及其复配剂防治茶假眼小绿叶蝉[J].江西农业大学学报, 2017, 39 (4):699-705.
    [16] 吴波, 程杏安, 蒋旭红, 等.苦参碱农用活性及其结构修饰研究进展[J].江苏农业科学, 2019, 47 (8):123-129.
    [17] 谢震宇, 肖斌, 冉隆贵, 等.3 种植物源杀虫剂对小贯小绿叶蝉的田间防效[J].江苏农业科学, 2017, 45 (3):74-76.
    [18] 张夏亭, 聂秋林, 高欣.除虫菊素的杀虫特性与作用机理[J].农药科学与管理, 2003, 24 (2):22-23.
    [19] 曹丽, 文明玲, 叶志华.5%云菊天然除虫菊素乳油防治茶叶假眼小绿叶蝉的研究[J].陕西农业科学, 2014, 60 (5):34-36.
    [20] 田梦, 陈凯歌, 曾鑫年, 等.光照对除虫菊素触杀毒力的影响[J].环境昆虫学报, 2011, 33 (2):180-184.
    [21] 谢娜.藜芦杀虫活性成分研究[D].杨凌:西北农林科技大学, 2018.
    [22] 赵丰华, 郑杰, 马建, 等.茶园假眼小绿叶蝉防控试验研究[J].湖南农业科学, 2013, 20:22-24.
  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article views(4) PDF downloads(0) Cited by()

Proportional views
Related

Field Efficiency of Five Botanical Pesticides against Empoasca vitis Gothe

doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.2019.03.010

Abstract: Empoasca vitis Gothe is the dominant population of the Empoasca flavescens Fab. It is also the main pest infesting tea trees in Shaanxi Province. Five plant-derived pesticides including 0.6% matrine aqueous solution(AS), 1.3% matrine aqueous solution(AS), 1.5% pyrethrin emulsion in water(EW), tea cicada killer and 0.5% veratrine soluble liquid agent(SL) were used to treat tea trees infested with. E.vitis to observe their field efficiency against E.vitis. The result indicated that 0.6% matrine AS, 1.3% matrine AS and 1.5% pyrethrin EW almost had no control effect against E.vitis. Tea cicada killer and 0.5% veratrine(SL) showed a good control effect against the pest, and had respective control effects of 57.0% and 32.4% after 1 day of treatment, 63.2% and 60.2% after 3 days of treatment, and 86.9% and 70.6% after 7 days of treatment. These results provide a new choice of bioinsecticide for the prevention and control of the main insect pest E.vitis in the field.

TIAN Xiangrong, LI Yantao, WANG Zhihui, Lin Jun, GAO Xiaobao, WU Hua, HE Jun. Field Efficiency of Five Botanical Pesticides against Empoasca vitis Gothe[J]. Journal of Tropical Biology, 2019, 10(3): 264-267. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.2019.03.010
Citation: TIAN Xiangrong, LI Yantao, WANG Zhihui, Lin Jun, GAO Xiaobao, WU Hua, HE Jun. Field Efficiency of Five Botanical Pesticides against Empoasca vitis Gothe[J]. Journal of Tropical Biology, 2019, 10(3): 264-267. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.2019.03.010
Reference (22)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return