Message Board

Respected readers, authors and reviewers, you can add comments to this page on any questions about the contribution, review, editing and publication of this journal. We will give you an answer as soon as possible. Thank you for your support!

Name
E-mail
Phone
Title
Content
Verification Code
Volume 10 Issue 2
Jun.  2019
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents

CHEN Di, LI Kezeng, WU Qiong, HE Yindui, YIN Xiaomin. Comparison of Two Extraction Methods in Extraction of Total DNA from Soil Microbes in the Rhizosphere of Pitaya[J]. Journal of Tropical Biology, 2019, 10(2): 184-189. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.2019.02.014
Citation: CHEN Di, LI Kezeng, WU Qiong, HE Yindui, YIN Xiaomin. Comparison of Two Extraction Methods in Extraction of Total DNA from Soil Microbes in the Rhizosphere of Pitaya[J]. Journal of Tropical Biology, 2019, 10(2): 184-189. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.2019.02.014

Comparison of Two Extraction Methods in Extraction of Total DNA from Soil Microbes in the Rhizosphere of Pitaya

doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.2019.02.014
  • Received Date: 2018-11-27
  • Rev Recd Date: 2019-04-08
  • In order to obtain the total DNA of the soil microbes in the rhizosphere of pitaya(Hylocereus undatus Britt.), two methods, CTAB-SDS and SDS, were used to compare their extraction effect in extraction time, color of DNA supernatant in the extraction process, and total DNA extraction amount and purity after extraction. The results showed that both methods produced DNA fragments with about 23.1 kb. With the CTAB-SDS method the color of the supernatant was light yellow; the total amount of DNA extracted was(7.4 ~ 7.7) mg·kg-1; the OD260/280 value was between 1.81 and 1.95, and the OD260/230 value was between 1.26 and 2.03; the average DNA concentration was 0.51 g·L-1. With the SDS method the color of the supernatant was dark brown-yellow, and the total amount of DNA extracted was(3.5 ~ 4.15) mg·kg-1; the OD260/280 value was between 1.52 and 1.68, and the OD260/230 value was between 1.35 and 1.53; the average DNA concentration was 0.075 g·L-1. It was hence concluded that the fragment extracted by the CTAB-SDS method was relatively complete and highly pure, which could be directly used for subsequent experimental operation, and was more suitable for the extraction of total DNA from soil microbes in the rhyzosphere of pitaya.
  • [1] VIGDIS T, LISE O.Microbial diversity and function in soil:from genes to ecosystems[J].Ecology and industrial microbiology, 2002 (5):240-245.
    [2] 张秋芳, 张美寿.火龙果的特点与引种技术[J].福建果树, 1999, 110 (4):45.
    [3] 孔维栋, 朱永官, 傅伯杰, 等.农业土壤微生物基因与群落多样性研究进展[J].生态学报, 2004, 24 (12):2894-2900.
    [4] STEFFAN R J, ATLAS R M.DNA amplification to enhance detection of genetically engineered bacteria in environmental sample[J].Applied Environmental Microbiology, 1988, 54:2185-2191.
    [5] OGRAM A, SAYLER G S, BARKAY T.The extraction and purification of microbial DNA from sediments[J].Journal of Microbiological Methods, 1987, 7 (2):57-66.
    [6] PORTEOUS L A, ARMSTRONG J L.Recovery of bulk DNA from soil by a rapid, small-scale extraction method[J].Current Microbiology, 1991, 22:345-348.
    [7] TEBBE C C, VAHJEN W.Interference of humic acid and DNA extracted directly from Soil in detection and transformation of recombinant DNA from bacteria and a yeast[J].Applied Environmental Microbiology, 1993, 59:2657-2665.
    [8] 张瑞福, 曹慧, 崔中利, 等.土壤微生物总DNA的提取和纯化[J].微生物学报, 2003, 43 (2):276-282.
    [9] HEUER H, KRSEK M, BAKER P, et al.Analysis of actinomycete communities by specific amplification of genes encoding 16S rDNA and gel-electrophoretic separation in denaturing gradients [J].Appl Environ Microbiol, 1997 (7).DOI: 10.1089/oli.1.1997.7.439.
    [10] NIEMI R M, HEISKANEN I, WALLENIUS K, et al.Extraction and purification of DNA in rhizosphere soil samples for PCR-DGGE analysis of bacterial consortia[J].Journal of Microbiological Methods, 2001, 45:155-165.
    [11] 刘峰.红树林可培养微生物活性评价和土壤宏基因组文库构建及生物活性筛选[D].儋州:华南热带农业大学, 2006.
    [12] ZHOU J, BRUNS M A, TIEDJE J M.DNA recovery from soils of diverse composition [J].Appl Environ Microbiol, 1996, 62 (2):316-322.
    [13] 宋培勇.从土壤中提取DNA方法比较[J].微生物学杂志, 2006, 26 (1):109-112.
    [14] 陈旭玉, 周亚奎, 郑服从.橡胶林土壤微生物2种DNA提取方法的比较[J].热带农业科学, 2008, 28 (3):41-43.
    [15] LAURAG G L, JAMES R, DANA J, et al.Comparison of methods of DNA extraction from stream sediments[J].Appl Environ Microbiol, 1995, 59:1141-1143.
    [16] TSAI Y L, OLSON B H.Rapid method for separation of bacterial DNA from humic substances in sediments for polymerase chain reaction[J].Appl Environ Microbiol, 1991, 57:1070-1074.
    [17] JACOBSEN C S, RASMUSSEN O F.Development and application of a new method to extract bacterial DNA from soil based on separation of bacteria from soil with cation-exchange resin[J].Appl Environ Microboil, 1992, 58:2458-2462.
    [18] LIESACK W, STACKEBTANDT E.Occurrence of novel groups of the domain bacteria as revealed by analysis of genetic material isolated from an Austrralian terrestrial environment[J].J Bacteriol, 1992, 17 (4):5072-5078.
  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article views(40) PDF downloads(2) Cited by()

Proportional views
Related

Comparison of Two Extraction Methods in Extraction of Total DNA from Soil Microbes in the Rhizosphere of Pitaya

doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.2019.02.014

Abstract: In order to obtain the total DNA of the soil microbes in the rhizosphere of pitaya(Hylocereus undatus Britt.), two methods, CTAB-SDS and SDS, were used to compare their extraction effect in extraction time, color of DNA supernatant in the extraction process, and total DNA extraction amount and purity after extraction. The results showed that both methods produced DNA fragments with about 23.1 kb. With the CTAB-SDS method the color of the supernatant was light yellow; the total amount of DNA extracted was(7.4 ~ 7.7) mg·kg-1; the OD260/280 value was between 1.81 and 1.95, and the OD260/230 value was between 1.26 and 2.03; the average DNA concentration was 0.51 g·L-1. With the SDS method the color of the supernatant was dark brown-yellow, and the total amount of DNA extracted was(3.5 ~ 4.15) mg·kg-1; the OD260/280 value was between 1.52 and 1.68, and the OD260/230 value was between 1.35 and 1.53; the average DNA concentration was 0.075 g·L-1. It was hence concluded that the fragment extracted by the CTAB-SDS method was relatively complete and highly pure, which could be directly used for subsequent experimental operation, and was more suitable for the extraction of total DNA from soil microbes in the rhyzosphere of pitaya.

CHEN Di, LI Kezeng, WU Qiong, HE Yindui, YIN Xiaomin. Comparison of Two Extraction Methods in Extraction of Total DNA from Soil Microbes in the Rhizosphere of Pitaya[J]. Journal of Tropical Biology, 2019, 10(2): 184-189. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.2019.02.014
Citation: CHEN Di, LI Kezeng, WU Qiong, HE Yindui, YIN Xiaomin. Comparison of Two Extraction Methods in Extraction of Total DNA from Soil Microbes in the Rhizosphere of Pitaya[J]. Journal of Tropical Biology, 2019, 10(2): 184-189. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.2019.02.014
Reference (18)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return