Message Board

Respected readers, authors and reviewers, you can add comments to this page on any questions about the contribution, review, editing and publication of this journal. We will give you an answer as soon as possible. Thank you for your support!

Name
E-mail
Phone
Title
Content
Verification Code
Volume 8 Issue 3
Sep.  2017
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents

HU Shanhu, CHEN Linqian, WANG Zheng, HUANG Huan, LUO Shengxu. Improvement of Reduction Method and Activated Carbon Adsorption Method for Removal of Cr(VI) in Water[J]. Journal of Tropical Biology, 2017, 8(3): 353-358,370. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.2017.03.017
Citation: HU Shanhu, CHEN Linqian, WANG Zheng, HUANG Huan, LUO Shengxu. Improvement of Reduction Method and Activated Carbon Adsorption Method for Removal of Cr(VI) in Water[J]. Journal of Tropical Biology, 2017, 8(3): 353-358,370. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.2017.03.017

Improvement of Reduction Method and Activated Carbon Adsorption Method for Removal of Cr(VI) in Water

doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.2017.03.017
  • Received Date: 2017-06-15
  • Rev Recd Date: 2017-07-15
  • Experimental conditions for reduction method and activated carbon adsorption method were optimized to remove Cr(VI) in water,and both methods were combined to observe their effect on removal of Cr(VI).The orthogonal experiments and double-check test were used to optimize the reduction method for removal of Cr(VI),resulting in optimum conditions for the reduction method with sodium metabisulfite,sodium bisulfite,sodium sulfite,sodium hydrosulfite and sodium thiosulfate as reducing agents.Under these optimal conditions,the reducing agents had a Cr(VI) removal rate of 96.59 %-99.48% in the water body.Activated carbon modified with manganese nitrate at different concentrations produced different effects on Cr(VI) removal and had the highest removal rate when modified with manganese nitrate at the concentration of 0.03 mol/L.The modified activated carbon had better removal effect than the unmodified one.The removal rate was affected by pH,initial concentration of Cr(VI) and treatment time.When the pH was 3,the removal rate was the highest(94.6%).The modified activated carbon had better removal effect when the contaminated water contained lower initial concentration of Cr(VI),and the Cr(VI) removal rates increased fast at the early and middle stage of absorption.The combined reduction and modified activated carbon absorption method had better effect on removal of Cr(VI)than the reduction method or the modified activated carbon absorption method alone.The simulated water samples collected from Haidian Stream,Haikou,Hainan,China were treated by using the combined reduction and modified activated carbon adsorption method,and the results showed a satisfactory treatment of the actual sample matrix by using the combined method.
  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article views(4) PDF downloads(0) Cited by()

Proportional views
Related

Improvement of Reduction Method and Activated Carbon Adsorption Method for Removal of Cr(VI) in Water

doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.2017.03.017

Abstract: Experimental conditions for reduction method and activated carbon adsorption method were optimized to remove Cr(VI) in water,and both methods were combined to observe their effect on removal of Cr(VI).The orthogonal experiments and double-check test were used to optimize the reduction method for removal of Cr(VI),resulting in optimum conditions for the reduction method with sodium metabisulfite,sodium bisulfite,sodium sulfite,sodium hydrosulfite and sodium thiosulfate as reducing agents.Under these optimal conditions,the reducing agents had a Cr(VI) removal rate of 96.59 %-99.48% in the water body.Activated carbon modified with manganese nitrate at different concentrations produced different effects on Cr(VI) removal and had the highest removal rate when modified with manganese nitrate at the concentration of 0.03 mol/L.The modified activated carbon had better removal effect than the unmodified one.The removal rate was affected by pH,initial concentration of Cr(VI) and treatment time.When the pH was 3,the removal rate was the highest(94.6%).The modified activated carbon had better removal effect when the contaminated water contained lower initial concentration of Cr(VI),and the Cr(VI) removal rates increased fast at the early and middle stage of absorption.The combined reduction and modified activated carbon absorption method had better effect on removal of Cr(VI)than the reduction method or the modified activated carbon absorption method alone.The simulated water samples collected from Haidian Stream,Haikou,Hainan,China were treated by using the combined reduction and modified activated carbon adsorption method,and the results showed a satisfactory treatment of the actual sample matrix by using the combined method.

HU Shanhu, CHEN Linqian, WANG Zheng, HUANG Huan, LUO Shengxu. Improvement of Reduction Method and Activated Carbon Adsorption Method for Removal of Cr(VI) in Water[J]. Journal of Tropical Biology, 2017, 8(3): 353-358,370. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.2017.03.017
Citation: HU Shanhu, CHEN Linqian, WANG Zheng, HUANG Huan, LUO Shengxu. Improvement of Reduction Method and Activated Carbon Adsorption Method for Removal of Cr(VI) in Water[J]. Journal of Tropical Biology, 2017, 8(3): 353-358,370. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.2017.03.017

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return