Message Board

Respected readers, authors and reviewers, you can add comments to this page on any questions about the contribution, review, editing and publication of this journal. We will give you an answer as soon as possible. Thank you for your support!

Name
E-mail
Phone
Title
Content
Verification Code

LU Ling, LAN Hanqiao, CHEN Taizhen, LING Peng. Evaluation of ornamental value of Coffea liberica in Hainan Island[J]. Journal of Tropical Biology, 2025, 16(2): 281-289. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.20240094
Citation: LU Ling, LAN Hanqiao, CHEN Taizhen, LING Peng. Evaluation of ornamental value of Coffea liberica in Hainan Island[J]. Journal of Tropical Biology, 2025, 16(2): 281-289. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.20240094

Evaluation of ornamental value of Coffea liberica in Hainan Island

doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.20240094
  • Received Date: 2024-06-04
  • Rev Recd Date: 2024-08-13
  • Currently, there is a lack of emphasis on the ornamental value evaluation and germplasm collection of Coffea liberica in China, making it difficult to systematically select outstanding C. liberica clones, which also restricts the commercial cultivation and application of superior selections of C. liberica in landscapeing.. In Hainan Island 128 individual seedling trees of C. liberica germplasm were selected for survey and statistical analysis of their ornamental traits Four evaluation criteria such as C1 leaf, C2 fruit, C3 flower and C4 others, and 14 evaluation factors were selected by using the analytic hierarchy process(AHP) to establish an evaluation system for the ornamental traits of C. liberica in Hainan Island. Meanwhile, the ornamental grades of 128 Coffea liberica individual seedling trees were evaluated to provide reference for landscape application and selection of elite ornamental individuals. The results show that in the overall ranking value C2(0.534) fruit has the highest weight, followed by C1(0.240) flower, which indicates that the ornamental traits of flowers and fruits have significant impact on the ornamental evaluation of C. liberica resources. Among the 14 evaluation indicators, P4mature fruit color(28%), P6 fruiting period(17.8%), and P10 number of flower branches(13.8%) are the main indicators affecting the ornamental value of C. liberica. Based on the comprehensive index score, 63 superior C.liberica individual plants were selected, which can be an important resource for landscape application. In conclusion, the AHP method can be effectively used to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of C. liberica germplasm, and select the most suitable individual plants for landscape application in Hainan, laying a foundation for their widespread promotion in gardens.
  • [1] 汪劲武.咖啡树风情[J]. 百科知识, 2017(16):8-11.
    [2] 张籍香,吴坤南.海南岛咖啡种质资源考察报告[J]. 热带作物科技, 1993(1):11-14.
    [3] 罗文扬,罗萍,雷新涛,等.盆栽新宠:咖啡及其盆栽技术[J]. 广西农学报, 2007, 22(3):55-58.
    [4] 袁卫晶.盆栽新宠小果咖啡树[J]. 湖南林业, 2009(6):31.
    [5] 吴庆书.热带园林植物景观设计[M]. 北京:中国林业出版社, 2009.
    [6] 丁雅雯.海南咖啡的园林观赏价值及高再生能力评价[D]. 海口:海南大学, 2023.
    [7] 宋敏,余萍,张慧会,等.基于AHP的北京市银杏单株观赏价值评价[J]. 北方园艺, 2021(22):90-97.
    [8] 杨建敏.基于游客感知的昆明市城市公园植物景观空间综合评价研究[D]. 昆明:昆明理工大学, 2023.
    [9] 郝杨,周育真,吴沙沙,等.基于层次分析法的佛子岩景区植物景观美学评价[J]. 西南林业大学学报, 2014,34(1):67-72.
    [10] 申敏敏.野鸦椿优良单株选择与植物配置造景研究[D]. 福州:福建农林大学, 2015.
    [11] 洪永辉,陈天增,方炜,等.金花茶优良单株选择技术研究[J]. 林业勘察设计,2020,40(2):18-22.
    [12] 周怡伶.雅安野生油茶主要性状评价及优树筛选[D]. 雅安:四川农业大学, 2022.
    [13] 赵铨叙.欧丁香优良单株选择及组织培养体系构建[D]. 哈尔滨:黑龙江大学, 2023.
    [14] TAO J, YANG Y, WANG Q. Two growing-season warming partly promoted growth but decreased reproduction and ornamental value of Impatiens oxyanthera[J]. Plants,2024, 13(4):511.
    [15] 宋爱春,董丽,晏海.基于AHP的北京地区观赏海棠景观价值评价[J]. 中国园林, 2013, 29(6):65-70.
    [16] 张涵.基于生态敏感性评价的河流型湿地生态修复策略研究[D]. 北京:北京林业大学, 2023.
    [17] 闫淑芳,冯树香,刘易超,等.观赏桃在石家庄地区的园林观赏性综合评价[J]. 河北林业科技, 2023(3):21-26.
    [18] 刘晓莉. 14个樱花品种观赏性状综合评价和樱花园林应用研究[D]. 杭州:浙江农林大学, 2012.
    [19] 刘伟平.探讨风景园林施工中的植物选择及配置[J]. 新农民,2024(9):72-74.
    [20] 曾明颖,王仁睿,王早.园林植物与造景[M]. 重庆:重庆大学出版社, 2018.
    [21] 刘冰洁.城市园林绿地中果树的运用及其评价研究[D]. 合肥:安徽农业大学, 2019.
  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-042025-0505101520Highcharts.com
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 12.5 %FULLTEXT: 12.5 %META: 83.3 %META: 83.3 %PDF: 4.2 %PDF: 4.2 %FULLTEXTMETAPDFHighcharts.com
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 20.8 %其他: 20.8 %哥伦布: 4.2 %哥伦布: 4.2 %张家口: 16.7 %张家口: 16.7 %石家庄: 4.2 %石家庄: 4.2 %芒廷维尤: 8.3 %芒廷维尤: 8.3 %芝加哥: 25.0 %芝加哥: 25.0 %西宁: 16.7 %西宁: 16.7 %运城: 4.2 %运城: 4.2 %其他哥伦布张家口石家庄芒廷维尤芝加哥西宁运城Highcharts.com
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article views(19) PDF downloads(2) Cited by()

Proportional views
Related

Evaluation of ornamental value of Coffea liberica in Hainan Island

doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.20240094

Abstract: Currently, there is a lack of emphasis on the ornamental value evaluation and germplasm collection of Coffea liberica in China, making it difficult to systematically select outstanding C. liberica clones, which also restricts the commercial cultivation and application of superior selections of C. liberica in landscapeing.. In Hainan Island 128 individual seedling trees of C. liberica germplasm were selected for survey and statistical analysis of their ornamental traits Four evaluation criteria such as C1 leaf, C2 fruit, C3 flower and C4 others, and 14 evaluation factors were selected by using the analytic hierarchy process(AHP) to establish an evaluation system for the ornamental traits of C. liberica in Hainan Island. Meanwhile, the ornamental grades of 128 Coffea liberica individual seedling trees were evaluated to provide reference for landscape application and selection of elite ornamental individuals. The results show that in the overall ranking value C2(0.534) fruit has the highest weight, followed by C1(0.240) flower, which indicates that the ornamental traits of flowers and fruits have significant impact on the ornamental evaluation of C. liberica resources. Among the 14 evaluation indicators, P4mature fruit color(28%), P6 fruiting period(17.8%), and P10 number of flower branches(13.8%) are the main indicators affecting the ornamental value of C. liberica. Based on the comprehensive index score, 63 superior C.liberica individual plants were selected, which can be an important resource for landscape application. In conclusion, the AHP method can be effectively used to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of C. liberica germplasm, and select the most suitable individual plants for landscape application in Hainan, laying a foundation for their widespread promotion in gardens.

LU Ling, LAN Hanqiao, CHEN Taizhen, LING Peng. Evaluation of ornamental value of Coffea liberica in Hainan Island[J]. Journal of Tropical Biology, 2025, 16(2): 281-289. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.20240094
Citation: LU Ling, LAN Hanqiao, CHEN Taizhen, LING Peng. Evaluation of ornamental value of Coffea liberica in Hainan Island[J]. Journal of Tropical Biology, 2025, 16(2): 281-289. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.20240094
Reference (21)

Catalog

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return