[1] 黄凯波, 徐世福, 桑锦凯, 等. 国内嫁接技术概述[J]. 湖北农机化, 2019(13): 42. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-1440.2019.13.032 doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1009-1440.2019.13.032
[2] 陈晶晶, 李栋梁, 杨倩, 等. 植物嫁接再生机理研究进展[J]. 植物生理学报, 2020, 56(8): 1690−1702.(查阅网上资料,doi打不开,请确认) https://doi.org/10.13592/j.cnki.ppj.2019.0575
[3] 邓竹英. 拟南芥/本生烟草远缘嫁接亲和机理研究[D]. 荆州: 长江大学, 2022. https://doi.org/10.26981/d.cnki.gjhsc.2022.000002
[4]

Huang S X, Ding J, Deng D J, et al. Draft genome of the kiwifruit Actinidia chinensis [J]. Nature Communications, 2013, 4: 2640. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3640 doi:  10.1038/ncomms3640
[5]

Kotoda N, Iwanami H, Takahashi S, et al. Antisense expression of MdTFL1, a TFL1-like gene, reduces the juvenile phase in apple [J]. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 2006, 131(1): 74−81. https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.131.1.74 doi:  10.21273/JASHS.131.1.74
[6]

Oberhuber A, Schwarz A, Hoffmann M H, et al. Influence of different self-expanding stent-graft types on remodeling of the aortic neck after endovascular aneurysm repair [J]. Journal of Endovascular Therapy, 2010, 17(6): 677−684. https://doi.org/10.1583/10-3172.1 doi:  10.1583/10-3172.1
[7] 陈哲. ‘井岗红糯’荔枝嫁接亲和性及其机理研究[D]. 广州: 华南农业大学, 2016. doi: 10.7666/d.D01036724
[8]

Wang L X, Liao Y M, Liu J M, et al. Advances in understanding the graft healing mechanism: a review of factors and regulatory pathways [J]. Horticulture Research, 2024, 11(8): uhae175. https://doi.org/10.1093/hr/uhae175 doi:  10.1093/hr/uhae175
[9]

Yin H, Yan B, Sun J, et al. Graft-union development: a delicate process that involves cell-cell communication between scion and stock for local auxin accumulation [J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2012, 63(11): 4219−4232. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ers109 doi:  10.1093/jxb/ers109
[10]

Loupit G, Brocard L, Ollat N, et al. Grafting in plants: recent discoveries and new applications [J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2023, 74(8): 2433−2447. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erad061 doi:  10.1093/jxb/erad061
[11]

He W, Xie R, Wang Y, et al. Comparative transcriptomic analysis on compatible/incompatible grafts in Citrus [J]. Horticulture Research, 2022, 9: uhab072. https://doi.org/10.1093/hr/uhab072 doi:  10.1093/hr/uhab072
[12]

Goodin M M, Zaitlin D, Naidu R A, et al. Nicotiana benthamiana: its history and future as a model for plant-pathogen interactions [J]. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions® , 2008, 21(8): 1015−1026. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-21-8-1015 doi:  10.1094/MPMI-21-8-1015
[13]

Xia C, Zheng Y, Huang J, et al. Identification of phloem mobile mRNAs using the Solanaceae heterograft system[M]//Liesche J. Phloem: methods and protocols. New York: Humana, 2019: 421-431. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-9562-2_32
[14]

Notaguchi M, Kurotani K I, Sato Y, et al. Cell-cell adhesion in plant grafting is facilitated by β-1, 4-glucanases [J]. Science, 2020, 369(6504): 698−702. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abc3710 doi:  10.1126/science.abc3710
[15]

Habibi F, Liu T, Folta K, et al. Physiological, biochemical, and molecular aspects of grafting in fruit trees [J]. Horticulture Research, 2022, 9: uhac032. https://doi.org/10.1093/hr/uhac032 doi:  10.1093/hr/uhac032
[16]

Pina A, Errea P, Martens H J. Graft union formation and cell-to-cell communication via plasmodesmata in compatible and incompatible stem unions of Prunus spp. [J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2012, 143: 144−150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2012.06.017 doi:  10.1016/j.scienta.2012.06.017
[17] 刘婧冉, 杜长霞, 樊怀福. 植物嫁接砧穗愈合机制研究进展[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2018, 35(3): 552−561. https://doi.org/10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2018.03.022 doi:  10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2018.03.022
[18] 刘新颖. 光质对黄瓜嫁接苗质量及愈合进程的影响研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2023. https://doi.org/10.27630/d.cnki.gznky.2023.000549
[19]

Choudhary A, Kumar A, Kaur N, et al. Molecular cues of sugar signaling in plants [J]. Physiologia Plantarum, 2022, 174(1): e13630. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.13630 doi:  10.1111/ppl.13630
[20]

Guan C T, Xu Y G, Yue H Z, et al. Difference in sucrose concentration between scion and rootstock influences the incompatibility of cucumber/pumpkin grafted plants [J]. Horticultural Plant Journal, 2025, 11(3): 1166−1180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpj.2024.02.014 doi:  10.1016/j.hpj.2024.02.014
[21]

Thomas H, Van den Broeck L, Spurney R, et al. Gene regulatory networks for compatible versus incompatible grafts identify a role for SlWOX4 during junction formation [J]. The Plant Cell, 2022, 34(1): 535−556. https://doi.org/10.1093/plcell/koab246 doi:  10.1093/plcell/koab246
[22]

Melnyk C W, Schuster C, Leyser O, et al. A developmental framework for graft formation and vascular reconnection in Arabidopsis thaliana [J]. Current Biology, 2015, 25(10): 1306−1318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.03.032 doi:  10.1016/j.cub.2015.03.032
[23]

Reeves G, Tripathi A, Singh P, et al. Monocotyledonous plants graft at the embryonic root-shoot interface [J]. Nature, 2022, 602(7896): 280−286. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04247-y doi:  10.1038/s41586-021-04247-y
[24]

Cui Q Q, Xie L L, Dong C J, et al. Stage-specific events in tomato graft formation and the regulatory effects of auxin and cytokinin [J]. Plant Science, 2021, 304: 110803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2020.110803 doi:  10.1016/j.plantsci.2020.110803
[25]

Liu Q, Wang X R, Zhao Y, et al. Transcriptome and physiological analyses reveal new insights into delayed incompatibility formed by interspecific grafting [J]. Scientific Reports, 2023, 13(1): 4574. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31804-4 doi:  10.1038/s41598-023-31804-4
[26]

Pina A, Errea P. A review of new advances in mechanism of graft compatibility–incompatibility [J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2005, 106(1): 1−11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2005.04.003 doi:  10.1016/j.scienta.2005.04.003
[27]

Pina A, Zhebentyayeva T, Errea P, et al. Isolation and molecular characterization of cinnamate 4-hydroxylase from apricot and plum [J]. Biologia Plantarum, 2012, 56(3): 441−450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10535-012-0114-2 doi:  10.1007/s10535-012-0114-2
[28]

Clé C, Hill L M, Niggeweg R, et al. Modulation of chlorogenic acid biosynthesis in Solanum lycopersicum;consequences for phenolic accumulation and UV-tolerance [J]. Phytochemistry, 2008, 69(11): 2149−2156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2008.04.024 doi:  10.1016/j.phytochem.2008.04.024
[29]

Martínez G, Regente M, Jacobi S, et al. Chlorogenic acid is a fungicide active against phytopathogenic fungi [J]. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 2017, 140: 30−35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2017.05.012 doi:  10.1016/j.pestbp.2017.05.012
[30]

Dellero Y, Berardocco S, Bouchereau A. U-13C-glucose incorporation into source leaves of Brassica napus highlights light-dependent regulations of metabolic fluxes within central carbon metabolism [J]. Journal of Plant Physiology, 2024, 292: 154162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2023.154162 doi:  10.1016/j.jplph.2023.154162
[31]

Miao L, Li Q, Sun T S, et al. Sugars promote graft union development in the heterograft of cucumber onto pumpkin [J]. Horticulture Research, 2021, 8: 146. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41438-021-00580-5 doi:  10.1038/s41438-021-00580-5
[32]

Liu R H, Jia J W, Wang C W, et al. An Transcriptomic and primary metabolic profiles reveal the mechanism of development and maturation of fuji apple grafted onto different dwarfed intermediate rootstocks [J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2025, 343: 114060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2025.114060 doi:  10.1016/j.scienta.2025.114060
[33]

Pu D, Wen Z Y, Sun J B, et al. Unveiling the mechanism of source-sink rebalancing in cucumber-pumpkin heterografts: the buffering roles of rootstock cotyledon [J]. Physiologia Plantarum, 2024, 176(2): e14232. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.14232 doi:  10.1111/ppl.14232