| [1] | 刘锐金, 莫业勇, 杨琳, 等. 我国天然橡胶产业战略地位的再认识与发展建议[J]. 中国热带农业, 2022(1): 13−18. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-0658.2022.01.003 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-0658.2022.01.003 |
| [2] | 吴敏, 何鹏, 韦家少. 海南岛胶园土壤肥力的综合评价[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2009(2): 1−5. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-6257.2009.02.001 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-6257.2009.02.001 |
| [3] | Cheng C M, Wang R S, Jiang J S. Variation of soil fertility and carbon sequestration by planting Hevea brasiliensis in Hainan Island, China [J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2007, 19(3): 348−352. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(07)60057-6 doi: 10.1016/S1001-0742(07)60057-6 |
| [4] | 贺军军, 姚艳丽, 张华林, 等. 胶园覆盖对土壤肥力及橡胶树根系活力的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2018, 31(7): 1444−1450. https://doi.org/10.16213/j.cnki.scjas.2018.7.019 doi: 10.16213/j.cnki.scjas.2018.7.019 |
| [5] | Hu A, Huang D F, Duan Q W, et al. Cover legumes promote the growth of young rubber trees by increasing organic carbon and organic nitrogen content in the soil [J]. Industrial Crops and Products, 2023, 197: 116640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2023.116640 doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2023.116640 |
| [6] | 薛欣欣, 王文斌, 茶正早, 等. 不同绿肥覆盖对幼龄橡胶园土壤团聚体及其有机碳分布的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2025, 46(11): 7013−7021. https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202409244 doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202409244 |
| [7] | 毛小红, 刘蕊, 周国朋, 等. 绿肥驱动作物–土壤–环境系统氮循环的作用与机制[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2026, 32(1): 1−12. https://doi.org/10.11674/zwyf.2025176 doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2025176 |
| [8] | 曹卫东, 周国朋, 高嵩涓. 绿肥内源驱动土壤健康的作用与机制[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2024, 30(7): 1274−1283. https://doi.org/10.11674/zwyf.2024269 doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2024269 |
| [9] | Gou X M, Reich P B, Qiu L P, et al. Leguminous plants significantly increase soil nitrogen cycling across global climates and ecosystem types [J]. Global Change Biology, 2023, 29(14): 4028−4043. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16742 doi: 10.1111/gcb.16742 |
| [10] | 刘强. 田菁的生物学特征特性及采种技术[J]. 河南农业, 2022(22): 14. https://doi.org/10.15904/j.cnki.hnny.2022.22.007 doi: 10.15904/j.cnki.hnny.2022.22.007 |
| [11] | 秦俊豪, 温莹, 李君菲, 等. 绿肥植物田菁的化感效应及对土壤肥力的影响[J]. 土壤, 2015, 47(3): 524−529. https://doi.org/10.13758/j.cnki.tr.2015.03.015 doi: 10.13758/j.cnki.tr.2015.03.015 |
| [12] | 朱小梅, 王甫同, 邢锦城, 等. 田菁翻压还田对滩涂土壤碳氮及微生物生物量的影响[J]. 土壤, 2021, 53(3): 529−536. https://doi.org/10.13758/j.cnki.tr.2021.03.012 doi: 10.13758/j.cnki.tr.2021.03.012 |
| [13] | 饶之杰, 薛欣欣, 王文斌, 等. 幼龄橡胶园不同绿肥原位还田腐解特征及养分释放规律[J]. 热带作物学报, 2025, 46(10): 2410−2421. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2025.10.012 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2025.10.012 |
| [14] | 赵娜, 赵护兵, 鱼昌为, 等. 旱地豆科绿肥腐解及养分释放动态研究[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2011, 17(5): 1179−1187. https://doi.org/10.11674/zwyf.2011.0205 doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2011.0205 |
| [15] | Angadi S V, Umesh M R, Begna S, et al. Light interception, agronomic performance, and nutritive quality of annual forage legumes as affected by shade [J]. Field Crops Research, 2022, 275: 108358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108358 doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108358 |
| [16] | Xue G Y, Wu J D, Zhou B J, et al. Effects of shading on the growth and photosynthetic fluorescence characteristics of Castanopsis hystrix seedlings of top community-building species in southern subtropical China [J]. Forests, 2023, 14(8): 1659. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14081659 doi: 10.3390/f14081659 |
| [17] | Xu W X, Yang Q, Jiang Y M, et al. Improving soil pH, nutrient concentrations, and enzyme activities by green manure returning in young and mature rubber plantation on Hainan Island, China [J]. Plant and Soil, 2024, 495(1/2): 341−358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-023-06327-6 doi: 10.1007/s11104-023-06327-6 |
| [18] | 徐文娴, 李金秋, 孟磊, 等. 葛藤覆盖对幼龄橡胶园表层土壤理化性状和酶活性的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26(9): 1740−1748. https://doi.org/10.11674/zwyf.20023 doi: 10.11674/zwyf.20023 |
| [19] | 袁淑娜, 黄坚雄, 潘剑, 等. 全周期胶园温光特性及其林下间作作物产量表现[J]. 广东农业科学, 2018, 45(1): 9−15. https://doi.org/10.16768/j.issn.1004-874X.2018.01.002 doi: 10.16768/j.issn.1004-874X.2018.01.002 |
| [20] | 鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法[M]. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 2000: 308. |
| [21] | Ballaré C L, Pierik R. The shade-avoidance syndrome: multiple signals and ecological consequences [J]. Plant, Cell & Environment, 2017, 40(11): 2530−2543. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12914 doi: 10.1111/pce.12914 |
| [22] | Poorter H, Niklas K J, Reich P B, et al. Biomass allocation to leaves, stems and roots: meta-analyses of interspecific variation and environmental control [J]. New Phytologist, 2012, 193(1): 30−50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03952.x doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03952.x |
| [23] | Friel C A, Friesen M L. Legumes modulate allocation to rhizobial nitrogen fixation in response to factorial light and nitrogen manipulation [J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2019, 10: 1316. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01316 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01316 |
| [24] | Xu G H, Fan X R, Miller A J. Plant nitrogen assimilation and use efficiency [J]. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2012, 63: 153−182. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-042811-105532 doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042811-105532 |
| [25] | Jarrell W M, Beverly R B. The dilution effect in plant nutrition studies [J]. Advances in Agronomy, 1981, 34: 197−224. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60887-1 doi: 10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60887-1 |
| [26] | 杨春霞, 赵志平, 杨丽萍, 等. 不同覆盖绿肥养分特性及其对橡胶园土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2012, 18(2): 467−474. https://doi.org/10.11674/zwyf.2012.11219 doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2012.11219 |
| [27] | 张婧旻, 李彩兰, 薛欣欣, 等. 豆科绿肥对幼龄胶园土壤养分及叶片氮含量的影响及作用路径分析[J]. 热带作物学报, 2025, 46(6): 1354−1362. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2025.06.008 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2025.06.008 |
| [28] | 赵志平, 许木果, 刘忠妹, 等. 胶园8种豆科覆盖绿肥的耐荫性研究[J]. 热带农业科技, 2020, 43(1): 10−13, 23. https://doi.org/10.16005/j.cnki.tast.20191223.003 doi: 10.16005/j.cnki.tast.20191223.003 |
| [29] | 陈明惠, 原慧芳, 李金威, 等. 山地胶园间作5种豆科绿肥的综合评价[J]. 热带农业科技, 2026, 49(1): 108−113. https://doi.org/10.16005/j.cnki.tast.20250514 doi: 10.16005/j.cnki.tast.20250514 |
| [30] | Huang J X, Pan J, Zhou L J, et al. An improved double-row rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) plantation system increases land use efficiency by allowing intercropping with yam bean, common bean, soybean, peanut, and coffee: a 17-year case study on Hainan Island, China [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 263: 121493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121493 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121493 |
| [31] | Senevirathna A M W K, Stirling C M, Rodrigo V H L. Growth, photosynthetic performance and shade adaptation of rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) grown in natural shade [J]. Tree Physiology, 2003, 23(10): 705−712. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/23.10.705 doi: 10.1093/treephys/23.10.705 |
| [32] | 黄坚雄, 潘剑, 周立军, 等. 光照亏缺对橡胶–作物农林复合系统中作物生产力的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2020, 28(5): 680−689. https://doi.org/10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.190858 doi: 10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.190858 |
| [33] | Hinsinger P. Bioavailability of soil inorganic P in the rhizosphere as affected by root-induced chemical changes: a review [J]. Plant and Soil, 2001, 237(2): 173−195. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013351617532 doi: 10.1023/A:1013351617532 |
| [34] | Wu J N, Zeng H H, Zhao F, et al. The nutrient status of plant roots reveals competition intensities in rubber agroforestry systems [J]. Forests, 2020, 11(11): 1163. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11111163 doi: 10.3390/f11111163 |
| [35] | Baldocchi D, Collineau S. The physical nature of solar radiation in heterogeneous canopies: spatial and temporal attributes[M]//Caldwell M M, Pearcy R W. Exploitation of environmental heterogeneity by plants. San Diego: Academic Press, 1994: 21−71. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-155070-7.50007-X |
| [36] | 王祥军, 黄肖, 张源源, 等. 不同品系胶园林下光照条件差异及其成因[J]. 热带作物学报, 2025, 46(12): 2910−2921. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2025.12.009 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2025.12.009 |
| [37] | Wu J N, Liu W J, Chen C F. Below-ground interspecific competition for water in a rubber agroforestry system May enhance water utilization in plants [J]. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6: 19502. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep19502 doi: 10.1038/srep19502 |
| [38] | Shen L, Wang X Y, Liu T T, et al. Border row effects on the distribution of root and soil resources in maize–soybean strip intercropping systems [J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2023, 233: 105812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2023.105812 doi: 10.1016/j.still.2023.105812 |