甘蔗渣和甘蔗渣炭对土壤温室气体排放的影响

王小淇; 索龙; 解鈺; 王丽华; 季雅岚; 田伟; 赖倩倩; 孟磊

doi:10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.2017.02.012

《中国科技核心期刊》数据库收录期刊
《中国学术期刊（光盘版）》全文收录期刊
《中文科技期刊数据库》收录期刊
《美国乌利希国际期刊指南（Ulrichsweb）》数据库收录期刊

高级检索

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

甘蔗渣和甘蔗渣炭对土壤温室气体排放的影响

王小淇, 索龙, 解鈺, 王丽华, 季雅岚, 田伟, 赖倩倩, 孟磊

文章导航 > 热带生物学报 > 2017 > 8(2): 196-202

王小淇, 索龙, 解鈺, 王丽华, 季雅岚, 田伟, 赖倩倩, 孟磊. 甘蔗渣和甘蔗渣炭对土壤温室气体排放的影响[J]. 热带生物学报, 2017, 8(2): 196-202. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.2017.02.012

引用本文:

WANG Xiaoqi, SUO Long, XIE Yu, WANG Lihua, JI Yalan, TIAN Wei, LAI Qianqian, MENG Lei. Effects of Bagasse and Its Biochar on the Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Paddy Soil under Waterlogged Condition in Hainan Province[J]. Journal of Tropical Biology, 2017, 8(2): 196-202. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.2017.02.012

Citation:

WANG Xiaoqi, SUO Long, XIE Yu, WANG Lihua, JI Yalan, TIAN Wei, LAI Qianqian, MENG Lei. Effects of Bagasse and Its Biochar on the Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Paddy Soil under Waterlogged Condition in Hainan Province[J]. Journal of Tropical Biology, 2017, 8(2): 196-202. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.2017.02.012

甘蔗渣和甘蔗渣炭对土壤温室气体排放的影响

doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.2017.02.012

王小淇¹,
索龙²,
解鈺³,
王丽华³,
季雅岚¹,
田伟¹,
赖倩倩¹,
孟磊^1, ,

1. 海南大学热带农林学院, 海口 570228;
2. 渭南市果业技术推广中心, 陕西渭南 714000;
3. 琼海市农业技术推广服务中心, 海南琼海 571400

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(41661051

41261063)

详细信息

第一作者:
王小淇(1989-),女,海南大学热带农林学院2014级硕士研究生.E-mail:wangxiaoqixing@sohu.com

通信作者:
孟磊(1963-),男,教授,硕士生导师.研究方向:土壤C,N循环及耕地改良.E-mail:menglei94@sohu.com

中图分类号: S156.6

Effects of Bagasse and Its Biochar on the Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Paddy Soil under Waterlogged Condition in Hainan Province

1. Institute of Tropical Agriculture and Forestry, Hainan University, Haikou, Hainan 570228 China;
2. Weinan Extension Center for Pomological Technology, Weinan, Shannxi 714000 China;
3. Qionghai Extension Service Center for Agricultural Technology, Qionghai, Hainan 571400, China

摘要: 在室内模拟水田环境,比较研究水田下添加甘蔗渣及甘蔗渣炭对土壤性质及温室气体排放的影响。结果表明:添加甘蔗渣炭能显著提高土壤有机碳、全氮、速效磷和速效钾的含量,而甘蔗渣只能提高土壤有机碳的含量。甘蔗渣和甘蔗渣炭都能减少N₂O排放,但由于二者对土壤Eh的影响程度差异导致N₂O减排的机制不同,甘蔗渣主要耗氧分解形成强还原不利于N₂O的产生,而甘蔗渣炭则通过增加通气性使土壤处于适宜于硝化发生的环境降低N₂O的排放。由于甘蔗渣和甘蔗渣炭都不能使土壤处于适宜CH₄产生的氧化还原电位（Eh）环境而没有导致CH₄排放。甘蔗渣和甘蔗渣炭的综合温室效应没有差异,但都显著低于CK。甘蔗渣转化成甘蔗渣炭后应用,既能改善土壤又能减排温室气体排放。
- 模拟水田 /
- 秸杆还田 /
- 甘蔗渣 /
- 生物质炭 /
- 综合温室效应 /
- 气体排放
Abstract: An indoor experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of bagasse and its biochar on greenhouse gas emissions from the paddy soil under 30 ℃ and waterlogged conditions. Three treatments were arranged: bagasse,biochar from bagasse and control（ CK）. The results showed that the bagasse-based biochar significantly increased contents of organic carbon,total N,available P and K,whereas bagasse significantly increased soil organic carbon content. Both biochar and bagasse mitigated N₂O emissions but were different in the mechanism of N₂O emission mitigation due to the difference in the effect of bagasse and its biochar on soil redox potential（ Eh）. The bagasse consumed mainly oxygen to form a strong reduction in the soil,which was not conducive to the production of N₂O,while the bagasse-based biochar mitigated the emission of N₂O through soil aeration suitable for nitrification. Both bagasse and bagasse-based biochar did not create a soil Eh environment suitable for CH₄ emission and had no change in CH₄ emissions. There was no significant difference in overall greenhouse effect between bagasse and its biochar,but they had significantly lower greenhouse effect than CK. It was recommended to convert bagasse into biochar for application in the paddy field. Bagasse-based biochar can not only improve the soil but also mitigate the emissions of greenhouse gases.
- Waterlogged condition /
- bagasse /
- biochar /
- overall greenhouse effect /
- N₂O /
- CH₄

[1]	杨宇莉, 武媛丽, 昝丽梅, 陈艺萌, 杨本鹏. 甘蔗开放式水培的抑菌剂筛选 . 热带生物学报, 2025, 16(): 1-8. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.20240047
[2]	张智宇, 谢珍玉, 黄爱优, 张报轩. 3种沉水植物对模拟养殖尾水的净化效果 . 热带生物学报, 2025, 16(1): 134-151. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.20240042
[3]	侯广庆, 程文肖, 邵徐杰, 石代仁, 贾睿宏, 叶进刚, 李昌珍, 李长江. 生物炭施入3年后对热带地区玉米生长发育和产量的影响 . 热带生物学报, 2025, 16(): 1-10. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.20240057
[4]	尹连政, 秦永强, 苏园园, 雷俊, 曾若菡, 黎平, 刁晓平. 退塘还林红树林大型底栖动物群落结构变化及影响因素 . 热带生物学报, 2024, 15(6): 780-790. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.20240009
[5]	龚文坤, 伍巧慧, 王钢, 杨劲明, 吕荣婷, 王蓓蓓. 火龙果根际促生微生物筛选及其效应 . 热带生物学报, 2024, 15(5): 632-638. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.20230138
[6]	谢蒙潇, 丘舒琪, 张怡, 谭丽花, 刘月廉, 胡汉桥, 王冠, 任磊, 王燕燕. 甘蔗环斑病致病菌的鉴定及生物学特性分析 . 热带生物学报, 2024, 15(5): 608-614. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.20230121
[7]	杨书云, 蔡金文, 李受鹏, 韩彦, 金鑫, 侯广庆, 邵徐杰, 程文肖, 李长江. 不同沟埋还田模式下菠萝秸秆腐解特征研究 . 热带生物学报, 2024, 15(2): 133-140. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.20230054
[8]	李昉泽, 詹剑. 木薯渣和甘蔗渣基生物炭对砖红壤的改良效果 . 热带生物学报, 2023, 14(5): 577-584. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.20230071
[9]	曾子鑫, 吴晓君, 李京晨, 王曙光, 郭佩佩, 张丽. 氮肥与硝化抑制剂联用对热带菜地氧化亚氮排放的影响 . 热带生物学报, 2022, 13(6): 575-581. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.2022.06.006
[10]	袁新生, 赵炎, 唐瑞杰, 胡天怡, 朱启林, 汤水荣, 伍延正, 孟磊. 生物炭及与秸秆联用对我国热带地区稻田土壤CH₄和N₂O的影响 . 热带生物学报, 2022, 13(3): 300-308. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.2022.03.014
[11]	王晟, 但建国. 施铁对普通野生稻田甲烷排放的影响 . 热带生物学报, 2022, 13(5): 496-501. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.2022.05.010
[12]	廖立国, 谭正洪, 蒋龙, 符妙, 金艳, 刘应帅, 章杰. 基于过程模型的泰国热带森林碳通量动态模拟解析 . 热带生物学报, 2021, 12(3): 279-288. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.2021.03.002
[13]	孙鹏, 刘满意, 王蓓蓓. 香蕉秸秆不同还田模式对土壤微生物群落的影响 . 热带生物学报, 2021, 12(1): 57-62. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.2021.01.008
[14]	符春敏, 尹黎燕, 邓燕, 兰超杰, 韩忠钰, 金鑫, 李长江, 黄家权. 施肥模式对菠萝产量及农田氧化亚氮排放的影响 . 热带生物学报, 2020, 11(3): 331-340. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.2020.03.011
[15]	施秀飞, 刘显良, 李俊凯, 杜晓英. 甲基化植物油对玉米田除草剂的增效作用(简报) . 热带生物学报, 2019, 10(3): 240-242. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.2019.03.006
[16]	黄睿, 郇恒福, 高玲, 刘国道, 黄冬芬. 不同豆科田菁属(Sesbania spp)绿肥对酸性土壤有机碳含量的影响 . 热带生物学报, 2017, 8(3): 324-329. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.2017.03.012
[17]	邱育毅, 陶忠良. 基于CFD的树高与风速风压关系的模拟 . 热带生物学报, 2016, 7(2): 211-214. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.2016.02.012
[18]	方赞山, 王星, 黄泉, 庞真真. 基于Ecotect的温室环境参数的模拟分析 . 热带生物学报, 2016, 7(1): 99-103. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.2016.01.017
[19]	甘仪梅, 赵兴东, 蔡文伟, 张树珍, 白亚东, 杨丽华, 杨桂林, 曹峥英, 杨本鹏. 不同海拔甘蔗蔗糖分的积累特征 . 热带生物学报, 2015, 6(1): 65-68. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.2015.01.010
[20]	索龙, 罗晨诚, 潘凤娥, 胡俊鹏, 孟磊, 何秋香. 生物质炭和秸秆对海南砖红壤酸性及交换性能的影响 . 热带生物学报, 2015, 6(2): 173-179. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.2015.02.012

点击查看大图

计量

文章访问数: 2
HTML全文浏览量: 0
PDF下载量: 0
被引次数: 0

甘蔗渣和甘蔗渣炭对土壤温室气体排放的影响

doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.2017.02.012

1. 海南大学热带农林学院, 海口 570228;

2. 渭南市果业技术推广中心, 陕西渭南 714000;

3. 琼海市农业技术推广服务中心, 海南琼海 571400

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(41661051

41261063)

作者简介:
王小淇(1989-),女,海南大学热带农林学院2014级硕士研究生.E-mail:wangxiaoqixing@sohu.com

通讯作者: 孟磊(1963-),男,教授,硕士生导师.研究方向:土壤C,N循环及耕地改良.E-mail:menglei94@sohu.com

收稿日期: 2017-01-19
修回日期: 2017-03-20

中图分类号: S156.6

关键词:

甘蔗渣 /

摘要: 在室内模拟水田环境,比较研究水田下添加甘蔗渣及甘蔗渣炭对土壤性质及温室气体排放的影响。结果表明:添加甘蔗渣炭能显著提高土壤有机碳、全氮、速效磷和速效钾的含量,而甘蔗渣只能提高土壤有机碳的含量。甘蔗渣和甘蔗渣炭都能减少N₂O排放,但由于二者对土壤Eh的影响程度差异导致N₂O减排的机制不同,甘蔗渣主要耗氧分解形成强还原不利于N₂O的产生,而甘蔗渣炭则通过增加通气性使土壤处于适宜于硝化发生的环境降低N₂O的排放。由于甘蔗渣和甘蔗渣炭都不能使土壤处于适宜CH₄产生的氧化还原电位（Eh）环境而没有导致CH₄排放。甘蔗渣和甘蔗渣炭的综合温室效应没有差异,但都显著低于CK。甘蔗渣转化成甘蔗渣炭后应用,既能改善土壤又能减排温室气体排放。

English Abstract

Effects of Bagasse and Its Biochar on the Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Paddy Soil under Waterlogged Condition in Hainan Province

1. Institute of Tropical Agriculture and Forestry, Hainan University, Haikou, Hainan 570228 China;

2. Weinan Extension Center for Pomological Technology, Weinan, Shannxi 714000 China;

3. Qionghai Extension Service Center for Agricultural Technology, Qionghai, Hainan 571400, China

Received Date: 2017-01-19
Rev Recd Date: 2017-03-20

Keywords:

Abstract: An indoor experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of bagasse and its biochar on greenhouse gas emissions from the paddy soil under 30 ℃ and waterlogged conditions. Three treatments were arranged: bagasse,biochar from bagasse and control（ CK）. The results showed that the bagasse-based biochar significantly increased contents of organic carbon,total N,available P and K,whereas bagasse significantly increased soil organic carbon content. Both biochar and bagasse mitigated N₂O emissions but were different in the mechanism of N₂O emission mitigation due to the difference in the effect of bagasse and its biochar on soil redox potential（ Eh）. The bagasse consumed mainly oxygen to form a strong reduction in the soil,which was not conducive to the production of N₂O,while the bagasse-based biochar mitigated the emission of N₂O through soil aeration suitable for nitrification. Both bagasse and bagasse-based biochar did not create a soil Eh environment suitable for CH₄ emission and had no change in CH₄ emissions. There was no significant difference in overall greenhouse effect between bagasse and its biochar,but they had significantly lower greenhouse effect than CK. It was recommended to convert bagasse into biochar for application in the paddy field. Bagasse-based biochar can not only improve the soil but also mitigate the emissions of greenhouse gases.

引用本文:

Citation:

WANG Xiaoqi, SUO Long, XIE Yu, WANG Lihua, JI Yalan, TIAN Wei, LAI Qianqian, MENG Lei. Effects of Bagasse and Its Biochar on the Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Paddy Soil under Waterlogged Condition in Hainan Province[J]. Journal of Tropical Biology, 2017, 8(2): 196-202. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.2017.02.012

全文HTML

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

返回文章

用微信扫码二维码

分享至好友和朋友圈

x 关闭永久关闭

《热带生物学报》编辑部参与2025年热区高校联盟年会

留言板

甘蔗渣和甘蔗渣炭对土壤温室气体排放的影响

doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.2017.02.012

第一作者: 王小淇(1989-),女,海南大学热带农林学院2014级硕士研究生.E-mail:wangxiaoqixing@sohu.com

通信作者: 孟磊(1963-),男,教授,硕士生导师.研究方向:土壤C,N循环及耕地改良.E-mail:menglei94@sohu.com

Effects of Bagasse and Its Biochar on the Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Paddy Soil under Waterlogged Condition in Hainan Province

计量

出版历程

甘蔗渣和甘蔗渣炭对土壤温室气体排放的影响

doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.rdswxb.2017.02.012

1. 海南大学 热带农林学院, 海口 570228; 2. 渭南市果业技术推广中心, 陕西 渭南 714000; 3. 琼海市农业技术推广服务中心, 海南 琼海 571400

作者简介: 王小淇(1989-),女,海南大学热带农林学院2014级硕士研究生.E-mail:wangxiaoqixing@sohu.com

通讯作者: 孟磊(1963-),男,教授,硕士生导师.研究方向:土壤C,N循环及耕地改良.E-mail:menglei94@sohu.com

English Abstract

Effects of Bagasse and Its Biochar on the Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Paddy Soil under Waterlogged Condition in Hainan Province

1. Institute of Tropical Agriculture and Forestry, Hainan University, Haikou, Hainan 570228 China; 2. Weinan Extension Center for Pomological Technology, Weinan, Shannxi 714000 China; 3. Qionghai Extension Service Center for Agricultural Technology, Qionghai, Hainan 571400, China

全文HTML

目录

第一作者:
王小淇(1989-),女,海南大学热带农林学院2014级硕士研究生.E-mail:wangxiaoqixing@sohu.com

通信作者:
孟磊(1963-),男,教授,硕士生导师.研究方向:土壤C,N循环及耕地改良.E-mail:menglei94@sohu.com

1. 海南大学热带农林学院, 海口 570228;

2. 渭南市果业技术推广中心, 陕西渭南 714000;

3. 琼海市农业技术推广服务中心, 海南琼海 571400

作者简介:
王小淇(1989-),女,海南大学热带农林学院2014级硕士研究生.E-mail:wangxiaoqixing@sohu.com

1. Institute of Tropical Agriculture and Forestry, Hainan University, Haikou, Hainan 570228 China;

2. Weinan Extension Center for Pomological Technology, Weinan, Shannxi 714000 China;

3. Qionghai Extension Service Center for Agricultural Technology, Qionghai, Hainan 571400, China